From: joakim@verona.se
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA>
Cc: Nikolaj Schumacher <me@nschum.de>,
web@shellarchive.co.uk,
Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>,
Masatake YAMATO <yamato@redhat.com>,
ohler+emacs@fastmail.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org,
rubikitch <rubikitch@ruby-lang.org>,
Phil Hagelberg <phil@hagelb.org>
Subject: Re: unit test framework
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:32:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3y6gr1w3c.fsf@verona.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwv1vfb15r2.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:22:17 -0400")
Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA> writes:
>> I write try to write unit tests for my elisp, and it would be much
>> easier if there was a canonical unit test framework in Emacs.
>
> Yes, that's the intention. We should pick one and run with it.
> The choice doesn't have to be "the very best", but it should aim for:
> - simple&clean code, easy to maintain&extend.
> - well maintained with a maintainer interested in taking a lead helping
> us integrate it into Emacs.
>
>
> Stefan
I've now tested "elunit" and converted to "ert". So far I prefer "ert"
because its available in ELPA, and the report looks like the ones I'm
used to get with JUnit or something similar.
OTOH none of the packages reported exactly where in my code my errors
where. "ert" was slightly better tough.
Just my €0.02, to get the thread going again. Again, to quote Stefan, we
should just pick something and run with it. I'm sure Emacs will
improve from it.
--
Joakim Verona
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-13 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-18 7:39 unit test framework Masatake YAMATO
2010-03-18 9:31 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-03-18 10:07 ` Leo
2010-03-18 10:23 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-03-18 11:25 ` Masatake YAMATO
2010-03-18 14:22 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-03-18 14:56 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-03-19 0:16 ` rubikitch
2010-03-19 19:00 ` Phil Hagelberg
2010-03-20 11:01 ` Nikolaj Schumacher
2010-03-23 9:02 ` joakim
2010-03-23 13:15 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-03-24 3:03 ` Masatake YAMATO
2010-03-23 14:22 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-04-13 10:32 ` joakim [this message]
2010-06-12 6:06 ` Christian Ohler
2010-06-12 13:48 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-06-14 11:24 ` Masatake YAMATO
2010-07-23 21:58 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-03-23 10:15 ` Philip Jackson
2010-06-27 18:50 ` Philip Jackson
2010-07-09 13:43 ` Christian Ohler
2010-07-09 23:01 ` Glenn Morris
2010-07-10 1:12 ` Christian Ohler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3y6gr1w3c.fsf@verona.se \
--to=joakim@verona.se \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=lennart.borgman@gmail.com \
--cc=me@nschum.de \
--cc=monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA \
--cc=ohler+emacs@fastmail.net \
--cc=phil@hagelb.org \
--cc=rubikitch@ruby-lang.org \
--cc=web@shellarchive.co.uk \
--cc=yamato@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).