From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Benjamin Riefenstahl Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5 Date: 05 Jan 2003 17:45:16 +0100 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <3E15B803.8080507@hekimian.com> <5xptrcjv3l.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1041785121 1744 80.91.224.249 (5 Jan 2003 16:45:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 16:45:21 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18VDto-0000S0-00 for ; Sun, 05 Jan 2003 17:45:20 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18VDxT-0006PZ-00 for ; Sun, 05 Jan 2003 17:49:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18VDua-0003wJ-03 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2003 11:46:08 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18VDtz-0003IK-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2003 11:45:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18VDtt-00039W-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2003 11:45:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [193.28.100.187] (helo=mail.epost.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18VDtt-00036n-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2003 11:45:25 -0500 Original-Received: from cicero.benny.turtle-trading.net.epost.de (193.99.153.6) by mail.epost.de (6.7.010) id 3E156C560002A29B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 5 Jan 2003 17:45:23 +0100 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <5xptrcjv3l.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> Original-Lines: 18 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:10498 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:10498 Pardon me for butting in. storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes: > We already use P_ in most cases (under src/), and __P in a few other > cases (mostly under lib-src/ and lwlib/). > > So it seems a bit odd that pop.c (as the only file) uses _P. > > I suggest we simply change pop.c to use __P like the other files in > lib-src. Both "__P" and "_P" are both firmly and totally in the compiler domain (anything matching the regexp /^_[_A-Z]/ is). Compilers can use these symbols however they see fit. "P_" OTOH is free for use in user programs. So if a change is needed anyway, it should be to "P_" (IMO). so long, benny