From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: tweak to apropos-command display Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:28:30 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1814.220.255.78.196.1108996512.squirrel@220.255.78.196> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1109112011 28841 80.91.229.2 (22 Feb 2005 22:40:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:40:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 22 23:40:10 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D3ihH-0002Vf-Lm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:40:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D3iyW-0004Op-2M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:57:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D3iwh-0003tL-8O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:55:59 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D3iwc-0003rB-LE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:55:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D3iwb-0003lG-SF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:55:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.236] (helo=pfepb.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D3iWA-0003eN-H9; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:28:34 -0500 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (0x503e2644.bynxx3.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.62.38.68]) by pfepb.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 294585EE01E; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:28:29 +0100 (CET) Original-To: David Kastrup In-Reply-To: (David Kastrup's message of "Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:01:56 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:33747 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:33747 David Kastrup writes: > storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes: > >> It also improves handling of menu bar entries in two ways: >> >> 1) If menu-bar-mode is disabled, it doesn't mention menu bar bindings. >> >> 2) It pretty prints menu bar entries like this: >> e.g. "File Menu" rather than " " > > Uh, how is it an improvement to leave off the "New file" information > from the menu? Because the is not always correct, e.g. corresponds to Options => C-x/C-c/C-v cut and paste (CUA) It wouldn't be too hard to get this right... E.g. could be shown as Options => Mule => Set Coding System => For Reverting This Buffer Now But the initial objection was that the key binding text was too wide. My aim was to make the text shorter... -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk