From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Changes in calendar/time-date.el Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 09:14:09 +0200 Message-ID: References: <871x9w9dkn.fsf@xs4all.nl> <87mzsezu5f.fsf@xs4all.nl> <87hdimzou0.fsf@xs4all.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1112685392 31632 80.91.229.2 (5 Apr 2005 07:16:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 07:16:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, ding@gnus.org, Lute Kamstra , Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 05 09:16:29 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DIiHe-0006PP-BJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 09:15:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DIhqV-0006Vz-01 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 02:47:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DIhqH-0006VB-MC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 02:47:18 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DIhqD-0006Sa-Tv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 02:47:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DIhqC-0006RA-7J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 02:47:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [212.88.64.25] (helo=mail-relay.sonofon.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DIiGi-0001cW-SQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 03:14:37 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 27419 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2005 07:14:26 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk) (213.83.150.2) by 0 with SMTP; 5 Apr 2005 07:14:26 -0000 Original-To: Reiner Steib In-Reply-To: (Reiner Steib's message of "Mon, 04 Apr 2005 19:20:59 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35571 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:60094 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35571 Reiner Steib writes: >> Can't you move this closer to the definition of message-make-date? >> It's only necessary to suppress compiler warnings for that function. > > I put it inside the defun. Doing that will slow down the function, so if that function is used a lot, I think it is a really bad idea to do so! -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk