From: joakim@verona.se
To: Deniz Dogan <deniz.a.m.dogan@gmail.com>
Cc: Emacs-Devel devel <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Differences between ibuffer and dired
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 16:34:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3wrtfcltd.fsf@verona.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimFKh-HOhIjnVuIbgDlE_xJCFrkb5QGK4HHeACm@mail.gmail.com> (Deniz Dogan's message of "Thu, 1 Jul 2010 15:49:38 +0200")
Deniz Dogan <deniz.a.m.dogan@gmail.com> writes:
> Why are there so many inconsistencies between the ibuffer and dired
> keymaps? E.g. "U" in dired unmarks all marked items, but in ibuffer it
> does "replace regexp". "u" on the other hand acts the same in both
> modes.
>
> In my opinion the modes are so similar in their use cases that users
> should expect the keybindings to be much more similar than they are
> today, at least for such basic things such as unmarking items. So why
> are there so many differences between them?
Maybe we should create an experimental "keymap consitency" branch?
I also find inconsitent keymaps highly annoying.
--
Joakim Verona
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-01 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-01 13:49 Differences between ibuffer and dired Deniz Dogan
2010-07-01 14:34 ` joakim [this message]
2010-07-01 15:16 ` Deniz Dogan
2010-07-01 15:28 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-07-01 16:47 ` Drew Adams
2010-07-01 18:33 ` Wojciech Meyer
2010-07-01 21:34 ` Stephen Berman
2010-07-01 21:38 ` Deniz Dogan
2010-07-01 21:48 ` Drew Adams
2010-07-01 23:27 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-07-02 0:09 ` Drew Adams
2010-07-02 0:13 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-07-02 0:38 ` Drew Adams
2010-07-02 1:02 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-07-02 20:57 ` Juri Linkov
2010-07-02 22:36 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-07-01 21:41 ` Drew Adams
2010-07-02 4:56 ` joakim
2010-07-02 5:31 ` Drew Adams
2010-07-02 8:17 ` joakim
2010-07-02 14:26 ` Drew Adams
2010-07-02 20:57 ` Juri Linkov
2010-07-23 15:40 ` Stefan Monnier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3wrtfcltd.fsf@verona.se \
--to=joakim@verona.se \
--cc=deniz.a.m.dogan@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).