From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How does the Emacs bug tracker work? Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:00:06 +0200 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: <4E0C44A2.1040604@dogan.se> <874o37tqq2.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309517772 27909 80.91.229.12 (1 Jul 2011 10:56:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 10:56:12 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 01 12:56:08 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QcbOK-0001HU-9k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:56:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33913 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcbOJ-0006rf-4s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 06:56:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49476) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcaWP-0000QE-F1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 06:00:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcaWN-0005VU-Au for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 06:00:25 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:45620) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcaWM-0005VM-Md for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 06:00:23 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QcaWJ-0004H9-4F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:00:19 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:00:19 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:00:19 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 30 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAElBMVEU3IBXZ8vK94+aMZkme ppWy0tOVZtnhAAACVUlEQVQ4jWWUy3IjIQxFVYPnA6Dc+2mN2ZNA9k4Qe0Pg/39lroQzjxrKrmrr tKSrByZpbS4pItJmY156GIemKJAhTS1x1lQ2WPqqjHPyGswxEdHFgNnbx3lwxM9P0vNhAGb54O71 NU4GXpk9QGvSwjjUHs1O39h7mlOzxiWa8kbOAXz3AAs542qLoZV/5lxySpfTqyqVOYal+FHzu9Ts NPmtaYxodn7U0j/zBmv1rtUOPjWUa8klLYSG9HP0CJc++JGoQLF5xNZ76D74I8TxIFdqtkJots6j H4uD7/xw2giiopWvEfWDWjjcneRS3RPAONFGFXYn9D87bSPAsX4P4U4Zx/pLptQO5D5IK4eswYQx mdn7M/BPcupAFwXIoS4nGhduZHWQ+4DctV0MxD0Ph1HRzrqB97cneAWIf4MrrAkfgDmG918goOVQ 5SpCNWT2JgromKgPQBTo24G9Qe+L1IpiGpPGD2oMlkQWupuxczQ24O0QPhdiZXSWnv34krUQC+1q /wMBuP8DxO8SVVeR9QeknT0A5JobYafMfqOXbuiqOXIhm1Fc8ZPycXpNdN1ANxcNXtWll7ajzVxK JVwCWbNN7N9ldQPHUd4EF8cOAjtqT+AX2pw3sB3Ygq05BrAyRcFbeBI4HlikWrBlCoqPOxZ0X5Gj 7hTYZyg8nx5XXb0NdNfwBPvZJ1cDE7mTrq3YFxNJhbD2CIZJX2o1hUDvhTIGrxNwcM2QN3FN13yR DaqkXDXSmy3diMXfkbLWquFcwURxofBng2dUKy7VPFURqN0C2x/6BVA4xtY6rSduAAAAAElFTkSu QmCC Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Beyonc=E9's?= _B'day_: "Green Light" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:4bP5pNl8t94KBefeGc60Wdz3eZM= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:141340 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > No, in my experience what I want to include in my searches depends a lot > on what I'm doing. If I'm searching for duplicates, I want to include > pretty much all previous bugs no matter what, and if I'm looking for > "bugs that need love" I don't want to include any wontfix, regardless of > their age. When looking for duplicates, do you normally do text-based searches in the web interface? Apparently the SOAP interface doesn't allow searching on the text... > IOW, I don't find the notion of "closed" to be useful. I think the normal understanding of "closed" is "a report we're not going to do anything further with". Which I think is a nice category to have. >> If `date' is the same as `log-modified', it means that nobody has >> responded to the bug. This can't be searched for, but can be >> highlighted in the debbugs buffer. > > Rather than highlight, I'd like to see them sorted first, but yes, that > should be good enough. Sure; I can add sorting commands and stuff to the debbugs buffer. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/