From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: joakim@verona.se Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Getting ideas from other editors: Postfix Code Completion Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 08:46:38 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87ppm0vwje.fsf@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1394092011 3500 80.91.229.3 (6 Mar 2014 07:46:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 07:46:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Tom , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 06 08:47:00 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WLT19-0000VL-QJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 08:46:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56102 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLT19-0005Wh-Ft for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 02:46:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42756) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLT11-0005Vf-W3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 02:46:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLT0w-0002M7-09 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 02:46:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.bahnhof.se ([213.80.101.11]:61179) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLT0v-0002Jl-Pu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 02:46:45 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (mf.bahnhof.se [213.80.101.20]) by mx1-reinject (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E1238ABC0D; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 08:46:43 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at bahnhof.se (MF4) Original-Received: from mf4.bahnhof.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mf4.bahnhof.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x72d-s-uRsP8; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 08:46:39 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mta.verona.se (h-235-102.a149.priv.bahnhof.se [85.24.235.102]) by mf4.bahnhof.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AD5C3D7853; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 08:46:38 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mta.verona.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id E59ED4F5885; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 07:46:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at verona.se Original-Received: from mta.verona.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (exodia.verona.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SfSAi8zPfn_D; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 08:46:38 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from exodia.verona.se (www.verona.se [192.168.200.15]) by mta.verona.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 162064F587F; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 08:46:38 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87ppm0vwje.fsf@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Thu, 06 Mar 2014 05:24:53 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Mac OS X 10.x X-Received-From: 213.80.101.11 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170176 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov writes: > Tom writes: > >> Here's an idea from IDEA for Emacs programming mode developers. >> This combination of snippets, completion and transforming >> typed expressions seems like a useful convenience feature: >> >> http://blog.jetbrains.com/idea/2014/03/postfix-completion/ > > Looks cute, but these are basically local refactorings. > > I think I'd prefer invoking them the usual way (with some key > combination, not after typing a dot), but as long as Emacs has no native > refactoring support, the question is moot anyway. Cedet has SRecode, which is useful for refactoring. > And when it does, implementing something like this would be relatively > trivial. > -- Joakim Verona