From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan... Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:10:35 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1109805304 32348 80.91.229.2 (2 Mar 2005 23:15:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 23:15:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 03 00:15:04 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D6d2W-0008M6-5V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:14:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D6dLM-0004L8-O0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 18:33:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D6dIS-00034A-OK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 18:30:29 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D6dIO-00031r-5n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 18:30:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D6dIL-00030h-K3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 18:30:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.237] (helo=pfepc.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D6cz7-0000Fg-Uu; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 18:10:30 -0500 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (0x503e2644.bynxx3.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.62.38.68]) by pfepc.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 0289F26281A; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 00:10:28 +0100 (CET) Original-To: snogglethorpe@gmail.com In-Reply-To: (Miles Bader's message of "Wed, 2 Mar 2005 21:12:28 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:34107 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:34107 Miles Bader writes: > I think an explicit decision should be made one way or the other. Based on the fact that _I_ don't have the necessary time to debug more silly xasserts, _I_ made the explicit decision to disable them. > > At the time I enabled it, that was not clear the degree to which it > would be a contentious issue (I had been using it personally for ages > without any notable problems, and I _did_ ask before I enabled it by > default) -- however, now it is. -- and now it isn't. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk