From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: smtpmail on Windows native Emacs with gnutls-cli from Cygwin freeze. Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 01:56:34 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1319414226 571 80.91.229.12 (23 Oct 2011 23:57:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 23:57:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Oleksandr Gavenko Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 24 01:57:00 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RI7uU-00048r-FF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 01:56:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46656 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RI7uU-0002d7-0G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 19:56:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52690) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RI7uR-0002cd-0N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 19:56:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RI7uP-0006Yl-W6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 19:56:54 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:42236) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RI7uP-0006YT-MY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 19:56:53 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RI7uC-0008Fn-47; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 01:56:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Oleksandr Gavenko's message of "Mon, 24 Oct 2011 00:53:12 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAElBMVEV8oJ0+OjE9ODA7Ny4Z GBZBPDPgra6MAAACPUlEQVQ4jWWUUa7jIAxFM1K7ADv1AjDD/wOS/46S/Bda9r+VuYa+TEePqlLL wdfXjsmUiROrNCIOHFpp7zXlmJWZCKQVae0fSI69khAXESPvmCkmUizBfxEyyTNCHSLICVWhHiAD 5JnUN50Jmdm2oFc68OSYWiAqGroK9ABS9mZWVMh50y/mQGTK3menxOa5QA6CzpxMqc6ZiKSWGqRb raEiCyJyRCHsqIRSSPCFsABkxSezOtRDpC04EfQGIHtOnjlg3yGO0QURc5V9xF4lhj9qHOG+F6gz TqpnrWlWN7NTlCXWknn26n1yaAt2kcZxrxyZKVkflcnjuB0iKzDjOSlajB/RZ6TUfY+9V7lGB2O3 fWuTrWXfD9hNkTiylnCb3uu67/erJUe6CP32DSaAyUAS55KT6wle+2ERDrbN4OUjYjegjHmg8hGB 7NZ29Icds5z702UANRDL4xNsvfIYENT+A4cBNED7vHxXcR9gs8H6APB6AkxmOaV2A6tJweosfoDH J0h9YgfYRnUdbKlVxjQ9pi/s9iKue3+0LFULV3kMsJgrA6k4TBKmEgmuS2/t5R3hMNwGvqbXcrcc b0AybkQHXwZ+DSnBGIvNxR1SK3JstwFgVW10ZMuvnB/7vr6GlATMlyulHK3mtZ1gDXZTpYoc5bk6 gOP1lmqEBNyeR3tuTX4vf24nsIsCoCXmuC55Gb3CXcWok7zsudmaB0gOUxvIIs7XxZDClaQi58vl fJdE3DvG7foJkFs9/Qj5Czb+1W6L694lAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Max de Wardener's _Where I Am Today_: "Noises From A Small Planet" X-MailScanner-ID: 1RI7uC-0008Fn-47 MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1320019000.28138@KSiCUCFVgPG6ekyuuDsfeQ X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:145451 Archived-At: Oleksandr Gavenko writes: [...] > (signal-process (process-id process) 'SIGALRM) [...] > and 'signal-process' call do nothing for SIGALRM. More correctly > return error. Look to 'src/w32proc.c': > > int > sys_kill (int pid, int sig) > { > ... > /* Only handle signals that will result in the process dying */ > if (sig != SIGINT && sig != SIGKILL && sig != SIGQUIT && sig != SIGHUP) > { > errno = EINVAL; > return -1; > } Isn't that the bug, though? Why isn't `signal-process' sending the signal we request on Windows? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/