From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs -Q not documented Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 11:28:28 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20050406.104501.107253615.wl@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1112780400 30169 80.91.229.2 (6 Apr 2005 09:40:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 09:40:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 06 11:39:58 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJ70R-0008RD-Q2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 11:39:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJ6ZV-00011l-R0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 05:11:37 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DJ6TA-0007fS-4L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 05:05:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJ6T9-0007a3-En for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 05:05:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [212.88.64.25] (helo=mail-relay.sonofon.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DJ6qd-00043Y-J6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 05:29:19 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 3654 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2005 09:28:55 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk) (213.83.150.2) by 0 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2005 09:28:55 -0000 Original-To: Werner LEMBERG In-Reply-To: <20050406.104501.107253615.wl@gnu.org> (Werner LEMBERG's message of "Wed, 06 Apr 2005 10:45:01 +0200 (CEST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35616 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35616 Werner LEMBERG writes: > Well, -Q has definitely its merits, especially for reporting bugs. > After seeing this discussion I still think that my `--bare' proposal > is not that bad: The -Q options really strips off all features you > would normally like to have for daily work. Yes, --bare-bones or --no-frills seem like good candidates, too. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk