From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Frank Schmitt Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Sending attachments Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:18:47 +0200 Organization: Hamme net, kren mer och nimmi Message-ID: References: <87eisjjrsc.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87ljmpuc8j.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1247682040 13079 80.91.229.12 (15 Jul 2009 18:20:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:20:40 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 15 20:20:33 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MR95i-0004cF-Jf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:20:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49969 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MR95i-0008Df-0B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:20:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MR95c-0008DM-Au for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:20:24 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MR95X-0008CV-VY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:20:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56669 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MR95X-0008CS-PL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:20:19 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:54087 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MR95X-00055I-9M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:20:19 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MR95U-0004B0-FH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:20:16 +0000 Original-Received: from zoidberg.uni-koblenz.de ([141.26.69.172]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:20:16 +0000 Original-Received: from ich by zoidberg.uni-koblenz.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:20:16 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: zoidberg.uni-koblenz.de X-Face: :EL9TzGRN){7|oE2~xQ8Q(VjpjsXgX$~gi&rYD5J5p)$w\Thdl~v:7h`/n)J!8nXT%_+Wj6}@EHM8}QbA(9nX-wrQ:ch1%DauV[?kFasXUcnL#+"K8zOx&$@/M'/}, q-eztaJra1|?C+p$h\2XnK-HB"8_U List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:112499 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > Pulling code out of Gnus has the downside that it then needs to be > inside Emacs, but XEmacs may not have it. XEmacs compatibility has (as > long as I can remember) been a Gnus goal. How should Gnus and Emacs > deal with this? I hope "drop XEmacs support" is not an option. Is XEmacs compatibility really worth the trouble? How many XEmacs users are still out there? -- Have you ever considered how much text can fit in eighty columns? Given that a signature typically contains up to four lines of text, this space allows you to attach a tremendous amount of valuable information to your messages. Seize the opportunity and don't waste your signature on bullshit that nobody cares about.