From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Concurrency, again Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 21:26:36 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87wq97i78i.fsf@earlgrey.lan> <20161012165911.58437154@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <20161012173314.799d1dc5@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <8360owaj2s.fsf@gnu.org> <20161013092701.77461800@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <20161017105345.2f255760@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <83y41nx8l6.fsf@gnu.org> <20161017123459.5ded9408@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <83twcayku6.fsf@gnu.org> <20161017135353.533db169@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <87wph6cp5i.fsf@jupiter.lan> <83h989wvpe.fsf@gnu.org> <83d1ixwtx5.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1476819087 15938 195.159.176.226 (18 Oct 2016 19:31:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 19:31:27 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: stefan.huchler@mail.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 18 21:31:23 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bwa6H-00012N-Ea for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 21:31:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43491 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bwa6J-0004XT-Ik for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:31:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46585) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bwa4V-0003kk-BO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:29:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bwa4R-0000Ry-DI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:29:11 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:48282) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bwa4R-0000Q9-72; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:29:07 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.1.64.getinternet.no ([84.215.1.64] helo=stories) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bwa49-0004tV-9H; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 21:28:55 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAD1BMVEXa0K43KB4EBgVmVD2J eFaT0j1RAAACbElEQVQ4jU2S25ntIAiFzY4FbNECAqaAeCnAKP3XdBbJzHzHh1z8ZQks3C5M4qZk JyJpE+EirYpzu2S8qrAH4GkPSTUbSNOAeDtB0gGOef4CImmSb4AxGeJ/QKqB8oLK8kh9Jzu5/wMz S3ojALYXVAMfkcuAWEa7LNwqH/ATOfcXYHsXtRM4LKcXbgaQxY2YC3vdwOWEn4hEsgF8BTl+ZKgb 9mWg4k6RQ44HDA8wXvB04gFTdOxd8gMuAFY5X6k4Wv+RuqbU/AI/pfuoP1IAdDjKcqpOuVZafxFc T1fze3lrHUDds3zDGmrxIXY8wlOgq8ctkVItIRYSGjNINDDogLMVDosEknnBnKftF0rwMKGaQQAH U+HHD2TqBDlTrkeg7cyiJsUnnzC8voBp8UlfyyMz4wgAUZ4nU8cssIFTggECyTMzJbm8VbgfcmcM TZ0GOFOiy09+AcPX2QAwH/Kly4ozsD0gGYiZDrpIH0BbpsAzEbGUYx408Gug3JjNc/aK0ud3A/hY 5UCra3c6dLW2htflnFp3vSr66p2CLbX1ttxp0zXcrh0biEVcf/Z3FgohhsrfLQtxjZUoEpRCAEgA 6ROYAvGN3otJLXNzqAnsZiUUg3U3xhYK1le1KEyNbuAFqSwMl4i+tczCHKTekSHlY49PxFDf7li0 r34XixiutUtN2i58q/A27SkFjgHife1tu0vrba1gk9RbNNDX2ndk2FIMrSAqqdrA2bhhDa8/bdlT xvHIIenyvbSGqSvP5TGgEVECl6I3eMzh8cP33nDxbzpqX3qjcr8sI316j7/3kmKgWEYGLm8xl9Vy B/cP71ySfVqHOjEAAAAASUVORK5CYII= In-Reply-To: <83d1ixwtx5.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 18 Oct 2016 18:36:38 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208443 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > In that case, no, so you cannot win there. But in other cases, yes. > So this will allow faster display of at least some pages, I think. Simple layouts take little time to lay out. You'd need a pretty gigantic text for layout time to be noticeable, so it's not worth the added complexity, in my experience. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no