From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Towards a cleaner build: done! Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 15:31:12 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="7707"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Emacs developers To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 20 15:55:36 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hdxXL-0001om-Sk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 15:55:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47902 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hdxXI-0002LW-Q3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 09:55:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56656) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hdxLM-000200-5h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 09:43:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hdx9r-0004Bk-NU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 09:33:08 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:42324) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hdx9r-0004BF-Gi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 09:31:19 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hdx9k-0007JN-Vd; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 15:31:16 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAElBMVEVNTVLq6uwgHBsPCgiJ i5MKBgQ52b9hAAACZUlEQVQ4jU2TQZa0KgyFAXFeVLMAO+jcQ8o5aGoDxcn+t/InUPZ7jJSPC8m9 YIyDxejw9DccuWRCZKIxC+a7JkHKCuqTP0Xm0GEGAL8gIgho4WKWbzy+oKQbzNwcCMkHJIA1ToiL bhWmlw+yjDPaM8MaLlnTFcXUWNKK+2aDE/DcN+yKEC44kFQh4Ff/sStC+GnYTjnDRujgfSseyK+T d7RPAT7W6wYRP+QPl+yUwVO073urkF5EaNAmzLgU4V9FcPkT2aGdtB1jJ+0DFTyPV0Q47I/aAXWG e6tHrpFzsjHJ/FL/U4QagpYbovO+hrl3DjoW41QRxpi0KtFu3LJUlY8MYwxLwKQPAoklSd2HpCHo VktKGfVw8U7amGT+GFtphdnSARtoTQp6gzThWuBX9kwL5sWIrgeFJL56MhHdsUqCCg4FjS45MNeT E/oLwJ44EkSaF5NwL7LQhhPqE3Mvtw2A2FASfECI9ZsgnV0OPBTxL1oKrv5kHxVEXEjI1b2ikq38 dPBkzqWOzOVw3sW9eExsI8vlE9DzoDfvqyqSHD43XORwBZlKagpw0jyMIbk+o8EaSXKKbcI7j2vp Cuo/URr0N+hV9cdiSDpHT/8HqWnb2TU1tY/S7xVujSUPoG6qvEkZ/ak1x+zlqRH/KQZAn3iXB2Iw HSsNMhRerM1QC0uSJ+5UBPQEvUxLHtrg7yURSewdfAiXRUUolkyOiqz6ggRm+gblpMViUi830wSr w/7SbTEC3AAfEduH7M3YvVJ1Gorg7IO6Vwo2eajbpysiqEWRD1bwZn7NrStmCVxtnzuQdGlr/wCo tqfdPMVLTQAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== In-Reply-To: (Noam Postavsky's message of "Thu, 20 Jun 2019 09:22:44 -0400") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 80.91.231.51 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:237966 Archived-At: Noam Postavsky writes: > On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 at 08:49, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > >> So: An "ERROR_ON_WARNING=1 make" flag or something? Or do we already >> have that somewhere? > > I think > > make "BYTE_COMPILE_EXTRA_FLAGS=--eval '(setq byte-compile-error-on-warn t)'" > > should already work. Oh, cool! Should we make this into a Makefile thing for easier use by anybody who wants this, though? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no