Re: PATCH: focus follows mouse in C

[Pavel@Janik.cz (Pavel Janík)]

   From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
   Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2002 16:52:29 +0200

   > > --- xterm.c.~1.703.~	Sun Jan 27 17:15:53 2002
   > > +++ xterm.c	Sat Feb  9 12:45:39 2002
   > > @@ -253,6 +253,15 @@
   > 
   > Ahem.. why is this only in xterm.c?  Is it just because this is a
   > prototype?  I mean, we surely want this for any version that supports
   > a mouse, including the Windows, the Mac, and the DOS ports, right?

Of course. I know that, Eli. I sent only changes to xterm.c. I will not
prepare changes for all ports because I do not have such systems and do not
want to do changes in something I can not test. I will send changes to
respective maintainers who will check and test them. But I will do that all
when we settle on the right solution...

   > And what about the tty version with xt-mouse or an equivalent?

The same as above applies.

   > > +  DEFVAR_BOOL ("x-autoselect-window", &x_autoselect_window_p,
   > > +    doc: /* *Non-nil means autoselect window with mouse pointer.  */);
   > > +  x_autoselect_window_p = 0;
   > > +
   > > +  DEFVAR_BOOL ("x-autoselect-always", &x_autoselect_always_p,
   > > +    doc: /* *Non-nil means always autoselect window with mouse pointer
   > > +even if user switched to different window.  */);
   > > +  x_autoselect_always_p = 0;
   > 
   > Isn't it better to have a single option which can be nil, t, or
   > something non-nil and not t?

Perhaps. Any other opinions?
-- 
Pavel Janík

No matter how hard you try, you can't make a racehorse out of a pig.
You can, however, make a faster pig.
                  -- An unknown author in GNU Emacs about Emacs's byte-opt

_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel