From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never). Date: 10 Apr 2004 03:37:10 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87eks0654s.fsf@sno.mundell.ukfsn.org> <87n06bp4ng.fsf@sno.mundell.ukfsn.org> <8765cwkejr.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <200404071157.UAA25094@etlken.m17n.org> <200404071312.WAA25268@etlken.m17n.org> <87zn9nqras.fsf@emacswiki.org> <87hdvux5uz.fsf@orebokech.com> <87lll6v514.fsf@orebokech.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1081554090 21588 80.91.224.253 (9 Apr 2004 23:41:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 23:41:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Romain Francoise , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 10 01:41:22 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BC5cg-0007cD-00 for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 01:41:22 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BC5cf-00042i-00 for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 01:41:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BC5aK-00041m-Pm for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 19:38:56 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BC5Zn-00040U-SD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 19:38:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BC5ZG-0003os-0E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 19:38:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.41.8] (helo=mx20.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.30) id 1BC5ZF-0003oK-Kg; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 19:37:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.236] (helo=pfepb.post.tele.dk) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BC5Z8-0004kl-HU; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 19:37:42 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (0x503e2644.bynxx3.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.62.38.68]) by pfepb.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 3EC825EE02F; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 01:37:29 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 19 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:21426 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:21426 Richard Stallman writes: > I agree that we should not include the multi-tty code in the next HEAD > release. However, it sounds like maybe the unicode branch is ready to > install now. I still think this is a bad idea -- it cannot be done without potentially destabilizing the trunk which is currently in a very stable state, and thus in a pretty unique state of "readiness for release". > If so, maybe we should install that as soon as > practical, then start pretesting from HEAD, and skip making another > release from RC. > > However, we need to remove the files that relate specifically to > encryption. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk