From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Tex-mode binding of C-return Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 13:25:00 +0200 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1115056350 644 80.91.229.2 (2 May 2005 17:52:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 17:52:30 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 02 19:52:22 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DSf4e-0007t8-AT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 May 2005 19:51:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DSfBa-0004hM-VU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 May 2005 13:58:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DSeTU-0004EL-6P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 May 2005 13:12:52 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DSeTO-0004DL-S0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 May 2005 13:12:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DSeRo-0003V4-SD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 May 2005 13:11:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.41.67] (helo=mx20.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1DSeVI-0001dc-BO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 May 2005 13:14:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [212.88.64.25] (helo=mail-relay.sonofon.dk) by mx20.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DSZ4n-0006m4-NU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 May 2005 07:27:03 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 78059 invoked from network); 2 May 2005 11:25:00 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk) (213.83.150.2) by 0 with SMTP; 2 May 2005 11:25:00 -0000 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:36584 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:36584 In a different thread, I suggested to change CUA's "toggle rectangle mark" command from S-return to C-return. The only real conflict is with Tex-mode which binds C-return to tex-feed-input which is also on C-c C-m. Since my plan (after the release) is to separate the rectangle handling from CUA, having a good "toggle rectangle mark" command will eventually become important even for non-CUA users. C-return is such a "good command", analogue to C-SPC for the normal mark. Do tex users really use C-return ? -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk