From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Tromey Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Switching to bzr: what remains to be done? Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:00:05 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87vdtu332o.fsf@red-bean.com> <200812090245.mB92j83j019610@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <87r64e8nqf.fsf@canonical.com> <873agm9zmh.fsf@canonical.com> Reply-To: Tom Tromey NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1231113637 16339 80.91.229.12 (5 Jan 2009 00:00:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 00:00:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Karl Fogel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 05 01:01:45 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LJcuc-0002gz-Ia for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 01:01:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43286 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LJctN-0001Rf-Hj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:00:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJctJ-0001Ra-Pv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:00:21 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJctH-0001RO-Dj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:00:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48671 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LJctH-0001RL-7h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:00:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:50781) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LJctG-0000eH-HL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:00:18 -0500 Original-Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0500Cmn022734; Sun, 4 Jan 2009 19:00:12 -0500 Original-Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n050090I031253; Sun, 4 Jan 2009 19:00:09 -0500 Original-Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-12-92.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.12.92]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0500855013225; Sun, 4 Jan 2009 19:00:08 -0500 Original-Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 9E6A350801F; Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:00:06 -0700 (MST) X-Attribution: Tom In-Reply-To: <873agm9zmh.fsf@canonical.com> (Karl Fogel's message of "Wed\, 17 Dec 2008 17\:59\:50 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.27.26 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107584 Archived-At: >>>>> "Karl" == Karl Fogel writes: Karl> Other than those, is anything (besides one-time conversion issues) Karl> preventing us from switching to bzr? Today I gave bzr a whirl. I tried cloning, and I was really surprised by the time it took: opsy. time bzr clone http://bzr.notengoamigos.org/emacs/trunk/ Branched 95250 revision(s). real 55m20.938s user 11m8.756s sys 0m19.971s I'm using the bzr from F9: opsy. rpm -q bzr bzr-1.9-1.fc9.i386 Is this expected? One hour to check out Emacs seems excessive. Tom