From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Problems with xml-parse-string Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 20:06:47 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87pqw6d7nz.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87zkvaiked.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87vd5ymptn.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87zkv97u1k.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87bp7pkcho.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285178660 15151 80.91.229.12 (22 Sep 2010 18:04:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 18:04:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Wojciech Meyer Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 22 20:04:17 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OyTg1-0003ql-EH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 20:04:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49910 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OyTg0-0006cC-RT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:04:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60499 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OyTfu-0006bM-C4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:04:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OyTfs-0002lA-Ti for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:04:10 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:59077 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OyTfs-0002eI-R0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:04:08 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67CAFD8522; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:03:34 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=YUZ3V+9KvyDyHLwAPy9opdjoUr4=; b=ldZ6Mv jYAg+2VKHotnj7zwUoJtp972HU/jUiW4wPlfkDUF9PUT3PfzDXqV3JGImF5PBUuS iDxYM1syWoHI4pvoVrN47CqiIJkvIOkdnca0OHJGHs5+IKzY8PGCR2zlnl+WWtSc 4081BoQzZMHiJUqV4w5cn5ZxPQlp5vP5684/E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=SjBTIOpkf9DUffTRIyQYlr+kMBH8rAqN NxSREIHJ5d5VeB/NLUrhuR07l5FbkUfO0y9pxGyxgMBEsmQKibq7qSL+E/4CMN82 r12RV2A5fGVVXqrsPRkoWtfGioQqcMoABT4D11PLOMBK3C1QtfpQ5DdbokU8838U V2FHboom+mo= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 425E6D8521; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:03:32 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [88.17.207.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 82E3AD8520; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:03:29 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Wojciech Meyer's message of "Wed, 22 Sep 2010 17:51:05 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B60F69EC-C673-11DF-B2A8-030CEE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130637 Archived-At: On Wed 22 Sep 2010 18:51, Wojciech Meyer writes: > My personal opinion, is to stick with something that is standardized - SXml > that handles all the cases, and have one and only one uniform > representation. Agreed; I'm surprised sxml hasn't come up in this conversation. http://ssax.sourceforge.net/ I would have thought also that htmlprag could be ported to elisp. http://www.neilvandyke.org/htmlprag/ These are idle thoughts, as I'm not going to hack on this, but as I haven't seen them mentioned, just wanted to throw them out there. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/