From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Network security manager Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 16:47:43 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87a93oh180.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83h9xw9zg3.fsf@gnu.org> <83d28k9yb9.fsf@gnu.org> <83ppcj9740.fsf@gnu.org> <871toze1tl.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wq6rcidx.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416412107 24818 80.91.229.3 (19 Nov 2014 15:48:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 15:48:27 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 19 16:48:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xr7UQ-0000Le-Ic for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 16:48:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59136 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xr7UQ-0002vy-8E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:48:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53466) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xr7UH-0002v8-U6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:48:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xr7UC-0002YV-JB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:48:09 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:49659) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xr7UC-0002Y7-D4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:48:04 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Xr7Tr-0007Q1-UN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 16:47:43 +0100 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEWctpsdFw6Fq47389aD ckZgr8BwraiHqYmBp4yGood+Kj9wAAACRUlEQVQ4jWXTMW8aMRQA4HfCC6OVW1ijiq5UpgMbJ55E b0NqfUq2FOVeb+xAc2GLkgauG6ecmvrf9j3bB0gYgYDv/Pye/QwYxxdLZP0gappdCegCLImo9FAI EGAeIH/twRZV0zDUbuPlF/WxLMkM57a1hwcKUkowYqhrt/UzivVYgAMG+AkyZm/GmE86DBFwA/7H TD9/NZPBEVgEJmBu7u7MbOEhzTQvQ7AcmOncFE8F4mLqn28FCnCQoDb0csPrZzIBVfrKOYDLslQb Oz8B4l+BXH6bbDT1AN89VFKg1DBLu6GvEvBw4CQn8m3r4ibeewEFnL3WkG83ssH5Az0pRKmS37yY 7FUnE8bVyxQXApy/QBe26p3oXnOk+aK9MhMB3OY84/2R6BuDwrlOwwzs5KRq3vFVIqF4W948OJQl HnmzV7y4U1k/w3GkupaTYNDYaj0ySgvUfFSNHLfMkEgjKUNDtZfn5egYJN0kgqX9Lhz2CkMdPdh9 7KgT+DpsUce+uY2QGkmL4Tk2WgQ+T6M8VLHPIshAD3QBSVijb1mGQQCd+qxOMA/A2XKo0vatzBBC +faCsriAJGUCuoT2Suqg8gzkzBVoNImG3fG63Cqlhoo7TuOgjVDJpfnQtQow9d3IazQMdf2RXxvX HYbDpXTXP74ffA/tmn5ck43lhEtlGRq52vz9CD5PaJ7J3zlbHMGnA7QeC5RxZ8ozoFIg1Ok/e1gL hE0ORxCB1mX4dQ58a4muxxJjzQkHkA8KINf3j+NSf8eLyOM/KOdM9hipAkgAAAAASUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: Lori Carson's _Stars_: "Treasure" X-Hashcash: 1:23:141119:emacs-devel@gnu.org::AeOrL2RdNL6PYTLA:000000000000000000000000000000000000000000Rp/H In-Reply-To: <87wq6rcidx.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:36:10 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/24.4.51 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1Xr7Tr-0007Q1-UN MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1417016865.56828@2NaiHPyGWUiKM6I6NuP9hw X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177764 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > You could create the *eww* buffer immediately? We could, but it would look kinda odd. Or perhaps not? Pop up the empty buffer saying "Loading..." It's possible. > Or just look for that buffer name (if you store just the name in the > process)? When the connection is made (and the certificate is examined), the *eww* buffer is still not created. > At medium or lower `nsm-security-level', I wouldn't expect to be queried > in the case you describe. But at high or above, I would. If the certificate is invalid when we're visiting www.google.com, I think the default (i.e., `medium') setting should be to query the user. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no