From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Towards a cleaner build Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 02:06:40 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83zhn6zkgf.fsf@gnu.org> <83a7eo9nsh.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="66131"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 13 02:07:15 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hbDGq-000Gv6-Lh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 02:07:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36252 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hbDGp-0001qq-Mf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 20:07:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45738) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hbDGQ-0001qW-Ua for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 20:06:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hbDGP-0006a3-Of for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 20:06:46 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:42024) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hbDGP-0006ZT-Hq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 20:06:45 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hbDGK-0002h1-Ji; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 02:06:43 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEUIAwcLBQsPBgsOCA3o 4uZHOzSdko8PBw0FAQYcFRIy+KLmAAACSElEQVQ4jWXTsW7bMBAG4FO8OJsYIkO2OEYHb2WItNXO 6AUUCuAuCvBYeCiyqciiMbZAA3zb/kdKiYMeDNjmJ/4kjxC9hd67GFvjI1eLP6F3caIREDe7F+N/ jeO4av2RAGWRwD1WnfHvCeoTAwHOfe8enzrz/L4eh9VLfSqC4RlD2/VOL3D9UjdXwewBf1tTOx2M qU/rga470xRns1eC3j6BKEH5CfvpDGgAu87sb87GK0nXAM9gmjxj/3g2zww9IDI4wLcvgEO3gD0N DH6G2wsgemJA+FHS0wf47wmeT4ApQ+8SKKLQYdsMd2gMwCZ4p4JhAjQVoANAkUFXDM0CZoZ6KiUf 1P0HzebqAnis9wncZnsB7QU8zNDVLkPdMxh/2mJ3tV0Au0rlJxwQ1wbwDF2Kwri7JypiC+hdht56 mycQbUOwIerIu+qNtyiniYTYBmejVpUmvtU+WhuPohRCFKEJVmilaVy5qG69FWIl5pJCaACCix++ KREklUqCqYBxIGrtUc2Pl4IfYVjzlLwAh6BILlE0P63l8oNhWK+LopxXnQPlsvickcZVmpBgwISU ptXyPMMJ79EuvU0HrS7XiB+1VVLpHMTwcF88bH7fvWox/akOP3X1qg8JgnXBWjQVFdFalxoKuIt4 aWPYuZzn0jeDKDfiJm9G4aN4AZmjUiGBh7iRKu+qmmKc9DTvH2NKygwxVhqUBjmOT5/PgV1FzsK9 5WZJ+dHdMv1NPVH56Evb+dLSGvPNzlAsHcISKrcXg1RmUHqu1N1/5SAtZkAfImYAAAAASUVORK5C YII= In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 12 Jun 2019 18:07:04 -0400") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 80.91.231.51 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:237472 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> In toplevel form: >> isearchb.el:80:1:Warning: Package iswitchb is obsolete! >> >> But as far as I can tell, the entire point of the isearchb package is to >> interact with isiwtchb, so should this also be obsolete? > > It is currently built on top of iswitchb and offers a way to "fallback" > to iswitchb, but it could/should be rewritten not to rely on iswitchb. I see... rewrite to use ido.el or something instead? I haven't used isearchb, so I'm a bit vague about what it does... > I think, just as for string-to-unibyte, we likely should un-obsolete > string-to-multibyte. Yes, I think so too -- they are sometimes what one needs to do... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no