unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, ")" <kazu@iijlab.net>
Subject: Re: buffering of process output
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 10:37:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3r7o5odl4.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3hdp242w8.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (Kim F. Storm's message of "Mon, 11 Oct 2004 00:36:07 +0200")

no-spam@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes:

> Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> writes:
>
>> storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes:
>>
>> It doesn't.  It's because there is no call to XFlush during the read loop
>> in call-process.  See the comment in xterm.c:
>>
>> /* Remove calls to XFlush by defining XFlush to an empty replacement.
>>    Calls to XFlush should be unnecessary because the X output buffer
>>    is flushed automatically as needed by calls to XPending,
>>    XNextEvent, or XWindowEvent according to the XFlush man page.
>>    XTread_socket calls XPending.  Removing XFlush improves
>>    performance.  */
>>
>> Thus redisplay_preserve_echo_area does not call XFlush any more.
>>
>> Andreas.
>
> Thanks for the explanation.  I'll fix that.

An explicit flush doesn't fix the problem -- it may have some effect,
but output is still buffered (at least) two lines per update.

I still see cases where the display is not really updated at all
(as if redisplay doesn't see that the display need update).

I'll keep investigating.

-- 
Kim F. Storm <storm@cua.dk> http://www.cua.dk

      reply	other threads:[~2004-10-11  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20030716.123727.83083338.kazu@iijlab.net>
2004-10-10  0:08 ` buffering of process output Kim F. Storm
2004-10-10 14:09   ` Andreas Schwab
2004-10-10 22:36     ` Kim F. Storm
2004-10-11  8:37       ` Kim F. Storm [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3r7o5odl4.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk \
    --to=storm@cua.dk \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=kazu@iijlab.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).