From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: while-no-input Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 00:03:00 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1B3ACCFD5694A94DBA4E231402B0E9ED9DD6C2@mucmail1.sdm.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1101596608 3370 80.91.229.6 (27 Nov 2004 23:03:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 23:03:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, klaus.berndl@sdm.de Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 28 00:03:19 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CYBb4-0001NT-00 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 00:03:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CYBkO-0004Ie-G4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2004 18:12:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CYBk6-0004I3-GS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2004 18:12:38 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CYBk5-0004Hd-LF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2004 18:12:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CYBk5-0004Ha-HJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2004 18:12:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.236] (helo=pfepb.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CYBaN-0002PN-K6; Sat, 27 Nov 2004 18:02:35 -0500 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (0x503e2644.bynxx3.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.62.38.68]) by pfepb.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 52B205EE023; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 00:02:33 +0100 (CET) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sat, 27 Nov 2004 13:51:25 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:30441 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:30441 Richard Stallman writes: > Current state is that RMS rejected Stefan's implementation of while-no-input. > > No further progress was made, as Stefan didn't want to pursue the > issue further and I didn't quite understand how RMS wanted to > implement it using a signal. > > I don't remember the discussion, but if you tell me what month it was, > I can search for the messages. October/November 2002 -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk