From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: James Cloos Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GNU Emacs is on Bazaar now. Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:00:15 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87d4206n80.fsf@canonical.com> <83tyvaewjg.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262114646 10025 80.91.229.12 (29 Dec 2009 19:24:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:24:06 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 29 20:23:59 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NPhfU-0007dT-HE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 20:23:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58733 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NPhfU-0002Rg-Up for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:23:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NPhfP-0002PS-0A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:23:39 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NPhfK-0002ME-Hb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:23:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50843 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NPhfK-0002MB-BR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:23:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eagle.jhcloos.com ([207.210.242.212]:1270) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NPhfJ-0006ry-Pp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:23:33 -0500 Original-Received: by eagle.jhcloos.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 7D86240086; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:23:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jhcloos.com; s=eagle; t=1262114610; bh=+GUV9leHFhe9IOD9jouOIWQDAuGbmcyRmZHn1Bs6Ba4=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=xGUFlVVo0Z7kLFS9TrOzY1D9NB+HibjxSFVF6HQnRM32RqhmAO0sR2VbAX/iACWjw QW/gtnmGNjCnV4vEwhRxFgdRt02Ru1c7xdmsv3Aq+kYUq6EJl/YxWjoIzptZxsckp/ cTM0h5GPOpzn6nzj0JOpGfaVQsLJGcWNoaBBSJO8= Original-Received: by lugabout.jhcloos.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 20F6F80131; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:00:40 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <83tyvaewjg.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:19:31 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1.90 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAABAAAAAQCAYAAAAf8/9hAAAABHNCSVQICAgIfAhkiAAAAI1J REFUOE+lU9ESgCAIg64P1y+ngUdxhl5H8wFbbM0OmUiEhKkCYaZThXCo6KE5sCbA1DDX3genvO4d eBQgEMaM5qy6uWk4SfBYfdu9jvBN9nSVDOKRtwb+I3epboOsOX5pZbJNsBJFvmQQ05YMfieIBnYX FK2N6dOawd97r/e8RjkTLzmMsiVgrAoEugtviCM3v2WzjgAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== Copyright: Copyright 2009 James Cloos OpenPGP: ED7DAEA6; url=http://jhcloos.com/public_key/0xED7DAEA6.asc OpenPGP-Fingerprint: E9E9 F828 61A4 6EA9 0F2B 63E7 997A 9F17 ED7D AEA6 Original-Lines: 17 X-Hashcash: 1:30:091229:emacs-devel@gnu.org::oCVcbLd/hxPNGOev:00000000000000000000000000000000000000000NCzi3 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:118962 Archived-At: On a 64-bit box (Linux kernel, GNU userland) the initial branch caused the python process to boloon to over two gigs of vm, most kept resident. One'll need a big box to work with the new repo. I can imagine that it'll be a significant load on the server, too. Too bad bzr is written in python. How painful is it to grab an additional branch from the main repo over sftp, comared to the grab of trunk? Ie, did the initial branch grab just the history of trunk, or di it grab the hsitory of all of the branches? -JimC -- James Cloos OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6