From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Tromey Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Integrating package.el Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:21:47 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87d41ihx9g.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87ocl167wx.fsf@hagelb.org> <8763795zsh.fsf@hagelb.org> <87r5pmwcf8.fsf@hagelb.org> <87hbp0qezu.fsf@lifelogs.com> <201bac3a1003010826s690a83fape7c44cadc672ac84@mail.gmail.com> <87wrxwost5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <201bac3a1003011322k1710f130j817e0c2e017ecf02@mail.gmail.com> <87fx4hm9z8.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: Tom Tromey NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267654956 20758 80.91.229.12 (3 Mar 2010 22:22:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 22:22:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Phil Hagelberg , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 03 23:22:27 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmwxQ-0003n1-SB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:22:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58336 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NmwxQ-00025L-AD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:22:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nmwx3-0001zQ-GH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:21:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54107 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nmwx1-0001yb-CP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:21:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nmwx0-000313-8a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:21:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53008) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nmwx0-00030v-0J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:21:54 -0500 Original-Received: from int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.18]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o23MLpWO008335 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 3 Mar 2010 17:21:51 -0500 Original-Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o23MLoC2011776; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 17:21:51 -0500 Original-Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o23MLlou028204; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 17:21:48 -0500 Original-Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 8ACC6379963; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 15:21:47 -0700 (MST) X-Attribution: Tom In-Reply-To: <87fx4hm9z8.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:22:19 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.18 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121626 Archived-At: >>>>> "Ted" == Ted Zlatanov writes: Ted> On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:15:53 -0700 Tom Tromey wrote: Tom> I wouldn't mind but I have basically zero time for ELPA right now, and Tom> for the foreseeable future. I've been hoping Phil will drive the Tom> project of adding the missing features and then integrating package.el Tom> into Emacs. Ted> Phil hasn't replied to questions in this thread for a bit so he must be Ted> busy as well. Would it be OK if I worked with the Emacs maintainers to Ted> patch up Phil's latest package.el so it can go into Emacs? Or should I Ted> wait a bit longer? I really don't mind waiting, but if I can help... Yes, it is fine by me. Tom