From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Image rescaling Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:42:24 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1410860603 22423 80.91.229.3 (16 Sep 2014 09:43:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:43:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 16 11:43:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XTpI4-00015E-Fk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:43:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36827 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XTpI4-0000AI-36 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 05:43:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37782) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XTpHw-000098-Km for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 05:43:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XTpHo-0006Uf-ED for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 05:43:08 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:58569) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XTpHo-0006SP-8T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 05:43:00 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58] helo=stories.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XTpHF-0005sL-2j; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:42:25 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAFVBMVEUAAAAOCwoDAQJrX1cD AwMBAQECAgJYo5WBAAACOklEQVQ4jXVTQW7cMAxkgTDnCnb6gn7AWKDnGNXqzAAmzz5I/P8TOqTs pIdWu9gFNCJnSA6pPP59qPzn0J5/a8Xp1b3Xul9AXLk1VWXVpg4cYKW8HyddhxlQA0qRwUz1RkjU bHSPCHcV+QwhxjNTAAgcnwHCIqDDxU8A7kP0/Q5RracaIoZrG/HqKTwOa/u6jgB8INBOEhtBZs+9 1RpA3CMcLGZyQEZ3AEpNhwjUg9d5sqihYqTSuFcJRTd/1NWfFlq/CoQsQRB1SOZ4/heSQEUEGCLL vn71JTlCEr7L41GIr2xHyMUB7wfGtv2Y74kAuERrhGKeWxHKoIh4opdm57cElu8UJTHI0cAYgH5M D7zlsFAZUhlHQTuoy7JNeuGogySGUJYAoOtqS6oSpC1lKyUEzyYcaGJ2RAskoZItgSg4ZwSy35N8 6xXdPpAjpupCnPU9ll/SK4qSVwAxVTy66uDsPkdE1K0soF5KQRuiIxiF93ZGy+UlHJtWmfPQYwzk xOco5S0rUHOMVv0ZpT/pmhWHM/biNNK4YfXb1VFIUxrdwA0anZ2ADGEdTG4YIYVjE8A9TBfa4D9K v7Hc1lU2cwCpfPoBP+zB7p0szQAtEWDw2oj3AI6GZoEuXYqgFyRyuJfgUx3TZgDThwa7x3KaXgai VzQADbVYauoNG6UpIRcQxLnssZxtdvicCGJ6RNTWMUTj0yRWV03GsSZH85yVXBudqDajdbohlPK9 Jaj3oIJEMByl1PmVV+X9D8TV4dfMP4bjAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Boris's _Black Original Remix_: "Black Original (Lugar E-Go Remix)" X-Hashcash: 1:23:140916:monnier@iro.umontreal.ca::4//plRYKt9qZagkg:0000000000000000000000000000000000000DRrN X-Hashcash: 1:23:140916:emacs-devel@gnu.org::htLjmxY2BhDuYRdr:000000000000000000000000000000000000000000zw2B In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 15 Sep 2014 20:07:37 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1XTpHF-0005sL-2j MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1411465345.35932@wwT+psJ0UY72Oaffnc/Frg X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:174351 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> 1) ImageMagick is crashy. Virtually all Emacs crashes I get happen deep >> in the ImageMagic code. I mean, I don't get a lot of crashes, but they >> happen from time to time, and are pretty annoying. > > WIBNI we could fix those? It would be, but I don't really want to become an ImageMagick developer. >"? >> Does this sound OK to everybody? > > I'm not super-excited at the prospect, but I could probably live with it. Ok, I'll start looking at algorithms... But if somebody else wants to implement this, please do be my guest. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no