From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Pushing the `gnus-range-*' functions down into the C layer Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 02:07:48 +0200 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: <878w3azhg5.fsf@gmail.com> <87mxrq4gy0.fsf@lifelogs.com> <871v92zd26.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284077294 28957 80.91.229.12 (10 Sep 2010 00:08:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 00:08:14 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 10 02:08:12 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OtrA4-0000Md-4J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 02:08:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56210 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OtrA3-0006Q5-Iv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:08:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42500 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Otr9w-0006PQ-Bb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:08:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Otr9r-0008HN-JJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:08:04 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:55173) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Otr9r-0008HC-8f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:07:59 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Otr9n-0000FM-C0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 02:07:55 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no ([84.215.34.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 02:07:55 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 02:07:55 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAgMAAAAqbBEUAAAADFBMVEV8YnsbCGESAFs7HWLk 9WcXAAACSElEQVQokR3PQWjTYBQH8LfVOpFGT9vYLvPgJgwPG2WVirMZ4kU89OCXLtmKB0nahKmR WQRZ7cZgV3dJtnwdbJek5utgBQ/z1pSAoOh6ijLvG26njNJCp/Yz3eXBj///PXhgTEwZWLQsJHEp yNIGMYgg2YKswbZDZdnSsZjhOaj6jcReO2+SCq9DwQ8llg7OiO5aKaA+JH6HJssnvRIP9Fskugud pZsM4oC6EP0UOVu+HVbDQBsue+vepHojxjJAaWz5cJGqEyPLPVD/O66KBQoTI48noU7bFZMGNwfY 6aDWKSjRqA+DKyhAu6q8jzowPvMc9ulnVljwQzC0osEc/bp6XGSuw9QqggwNq8Ol8GXog34o1g/W x4pX4g4EKNWZZ0OZyMCDnpoGxcT37bENGF1xawjKifOdHyUgHzPTCDZp2z996eh76F8bytXz6i81 igWlwYNQaC2RSkgxlHoLuD/DT60qtYgGcTCopRBFxxJvCoA7gm1rkqkQnAatZWKOYEm0eQTyl7ds qY3x/gn6CdajF84OQ3bh5BCBtGaD3ysm4SiNwObnoFFzWJARAkES85UIuI7ueWBi0klGfKenHCSW LYafRFy29ygAh2avblxy56+hAMTIxrKDtdfhLnRpNj4/9mqrvwubbMaS6J16AWxl7y5yufXDLgRh Nj6D8+rxRWJ/GOjIa6qIUBMMZWt0WnyoimnkgW0t9N83Wkkvn2uCKVXuMKSZ9Lo7Fs/2MWJT9VAq eJtLeSkZBSOdAg1pKKe9QSiXbv4HISYWHyMa9zEAAAAASUVORK5CYII= Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Prince's _1999_: "1999" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:GeT9dG0BedyHYlMiZVwcu0uqtl8= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:129849 Archived-At: Wojciech Meyer writes: > I think they are best to solve your performance problems. The idea is > to keep just one array for all of the articles, means one per > group. That would be just the internal representation, you still > save-read from lists with article ranges. The performance issue is converting between FOO and ranges. Representing FOO as arrays instead of lists doesn't help with the conversion problem. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen