From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs WIN32 crashes on reinitialzing of lisp process using slime Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:20:19 +0200 Message-ID: References: <461EAF08.1050202@gnu.org> <461EB54F.40909@gnu.org> <461F53FE.9000800@gnu.org> <461F6F60.4010007@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1176466856 12147 80.91.229.12 (13 Apr 2007 12:20:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:20:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , carstenblaauw@web.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Jason Rumney To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 13 14:20:48 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HcKlk-0000cJ-Bz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:20:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HcKq0-0005W3-OY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:25:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HcKpv-0005Qb-6g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:25:07 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HcKpu-0005NP-16 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:25:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HcKpt-0005N9-TP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:25:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-relay.sonofon.dk ([212.88.64.25]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HcKlc-0007u1-5h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:20:40 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 46439 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2007 12:20:38 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk) (213.83.150.2) by 0 with SMTP; 13 Apr 2007 12:20:38 -0000 In-Reply-To: <461F6F60.4010007@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Fri\, 13 Apr 2007 13\:54\:08 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.97 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: FreeBSD 4.6-4.9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69384 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: >> I don't know. I couldn't reproduce it by setting a kill-buffer-hook that >> calls kill-buffer, so it must be specific to the way it is done by slime >> (using a process-sentinel rather than kill-buffer-hook). > > kill-buffer has a window of opportunity before it sets buffer-name to > nil. Could you try reproducing the slime crash with the patch I sent to > emacs-pretest? Could you also try if the following (simpler) patch gives good results. *** buffer.c 29 Mar 2007 22:06:47 +0200 1.525 --- buffer.c 13 Apr 2007 14:17:29 +0200 *************** *** 1458,1464 **** --- 1458,1470 ---- unlock_buffer (b); #endif /* CLASH_DETECTION */ + GCPRO1 (buf); kill_buffer_processes (buf); + UNGCPRO; + + if (NILP (b->name)) + return Qnil; + clear_charpos_cache (b); tem = Vinhibit_quit; -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk