From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jay Belanger Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: finish version test cleanup: Lucid Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:35:05 -0500 Message-ID: References: <200710281747.l9SHlHL1026263@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <4724ECDF.3080806@ig.com.br> <200710290045.l9T0jDrl006236@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: jay.p.belanger@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1193636125 12415 80.91.229.12 (29 Oct 2007 05:35:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:35:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jay.p.belanger@gmail.com To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 29 06:35:26 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ImNHZ-0000os-Vu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 06:35:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ImNHQ-0002nm-No for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 01:35:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ImNHM-0002lx-Q8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 01:35:12 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ImNHK-0002ia-QN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 01:35:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ImNHK-0002iT-HC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 01:35:10 -0400 Original-Received: from s4.cableone.net ([24.116.0.230]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ImNHI-0007Qi-Qd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 01:35:09 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain (unverified [24.117.100.114]) by S4.cableone.net (CableOne SMTP Service S4) with ESMTP id 129193724 for multiple; Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:35:07 -0700 In-Reply-To: <200710290045.l9T0jDrl006236@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> (Dan Nicolaescu's message of "Sun, 28 Oct 2007 17:45:13 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NotAscii: charset=us-ascii X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 1, First 3, in=4, out=0, spam=0 X-External-IP: 24.117.100.114 X-Abuse-Info: Send abuse complaints to abuse@cableone.net X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:82028 Archived-At: Dan Nicolaescu writes: ... > > No XEmacs support has been removed from Emacs's Calc, but none has been > > added as new features have been added, so I don't know if the current > > version will work with XEmacs. XEmacs has it's own version of Calc, > > although I don't think it has been updated for a while. > > That is fine. > Is the goal of that code to test if calc is running on XEmacs? Yes. > If yes, then replacing calc-emacs-type-lucid with (featurep 'xemacs) is > better. The featurep test can be completely optimized away at compile > time, and it is as readable an a tiny bit shorter. Doing that will > make the byte compiler not to warn about missing XEmacs functions. The other option would just be to remove Lucid support altogether. Jay