From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 94, Issue 89 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 23:10:35 +0200 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: <83zkv7rmpe.fsf@gnu.org> <83iq1us2hx.fsf@gnu.org> <83tyldqxut.fsf@gnu.org> <87hbhb9p5v.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285621864 4573 80.91.229.12 (27 Sep 2010 21:11:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:11:04 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 27 23:11:03 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P0KyT-0000qW-9r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 23:11:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38563 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P0KyS-0004uJ-Iw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:11:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53678 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P0KyJ-0004rs-7T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:10:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P0KyE-0001cD-Ip for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:10:51 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:44533) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P0KyE-0001bk-8G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:10:46 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P0Ky9-0000jD-N6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 23:10:41 +0200 Original-Received: from 84.215.34.171 ([84.215.34.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 23:10:41 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by 84.215.34.171 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 23:10:41 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 13 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 84.215.34.171 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEULAwSMQCNZJBgVCgs4 FRMOCAcMBgW9mTglDw+TXSiN3w6qAAACQklEQVQ4jVWTMY+jMBCFkbJZpTVNRInFSUl550WiDWvp uPa4sVKmCX22sehuBSs5JWmQ/+3NjA26TMMwn5/njTGJUmpQ7r9QHGXSqhhuPIyDqiJQSdsCBJin n1VcXgIkQNGWyHIh5TvVuZRcwXRXTl1dFF/4LCPoMJAZgN/FN6xcAfOOQRAAnMevmOHCBFeH3pXT o3MD54YU12Cqcm4MYwzV0CHABgywpsOAKOteCcA5jKx1s8ALAujMmV8b3L5qdNO4URNAT3+01sio 0agpiktHk5u3otBjMyydMBgY8yZlEY1SvZaL4odE8r4CfOM5oCMgw2Q4DAMDiekCwM4B1FKmdFZ4 ZLyVUuNQOfQqZZ52huwyOCiHBmpxcAQMA97qUJ2w+Mt/IMCtCHQR7O1j9JN3mgCsPQ4nbx/H2duG XAEo/B6h+XG+eXs77QscMAAAtvtzTjNrva0LVrT4oVgh81lYjH4FsIA91e1NEzAEaKs0F/nM4IMW IVB0iN+FyLwIigcDsmsIeC8mby12TyNo6XQRZGKaWCFXgJfrU+DE3s9W2J7KIkyOwPsp8z72znAZ K6C7e44ZffkJ+y0AFtDjfCEFtrsC6hHSkoEKYJpt/wzaADK268nE01bpPgK00JdQLuBRByBI2Jfl opi0zvlwhTxiL9UuoMALiGSi8z+iAv9zvHB3qvPVDJH1EMGDL7/mj0catmsur3cS1LquVwkpLkly VvG3jTFqOisEm/Jvkry87Ha7zfnlsqkG/mufYrvdLtk/lkFx3b7jxyQAAAAASUVORK5CYII= Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Marc and the Mambas's _"Untitled"_: "Caroline Says" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:WAjyazlCxuFbU0JRyTLPS79hwT0= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:131031 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> So rename all instances of XINT in the source tree to XEINT first? > > That's the part I didn't like about using XINT for `int'. Me neither. The code churn would be massive, wouldn't it? I think IXINT is the most pleasing suggestion so far. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen