From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sam Steingold Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile Date: 03 Aug 2002 12:15:50 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200207200035.g6K0ZAb27891@aztec.santafe.edu> <200207212015.g6LKF4c00874@aztec.santafe.edu> <200207251807.g6PI75d07615@aztec.santafe.edu> <874renlito.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <200207271853.g6RIre710837@aztec.santafe.edu> <200207310554.g6V5ssc16508@aztec.santafe.edu> <200208022214.g72MELZ01879@aztec.santafe.edu> Reply-To: sds@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1028391273 4977 127.0.0.1 (3 Aug 2002 16:14:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002 16:14:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17b1Xz-0001I5-00 for ; Sat, 03 Aug 2002 18:14:31 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17b1rj-0002mj-00 for ; Sat, 03 Aug 2002 18:34:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17b1YV-0003sW-00; Sat, 03 Aug 2002 12:15:03 -0400 Original-Received: from pool-151-203-30-217.bos.east.verizon.net ([151.203.30.217] helo=loiso.podval.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17b1Xq-0003rf-00; Sat, 03 Aug 2002 12:14:23 -0400 Original-Received: from loiso.podval.org (loiso [127.0.0.1]) by loiso.podval.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g73GFoi09097; Sat, 3 Aug 2002 12:15:50 -0400 Original-To: rms@gnu.org X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 25 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:6261 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:6261 > * In message > * On the subject of "Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile" > * Sent on Sat, 03 Aug 2002 17:38:33 +0200 > * Honorable Simon Josefsson writes: > > Since visibility of the work on Guile Emacs seem to be pretty much > nil, one way to prove that CLISP would be a better way would be to > simply get a barely working emacs clone running on it and document > some design considerations and thoughts. I'm sure it would attract > people that want to work on it. I am not so sure about it. > Can CLISP take advantage of the non-ASCII work that has gone into > GNOME? This seems to be one major work item for a Guile port. > Leveraging on the GNOME work seem to give many modern features easily > (Unicode, bidi). CLISP uses Unicode. -- Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running RedHat7.3 GNU/Linux Linux - find out what you've been missing while you've been rebooting Windows