From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Geometry interpretation change? (was: FIX#3: byte-code: Wrong type argument: number-or-marker-p, (+ -21)) Date: 07 Dec 2003 01:57:48 +0100 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <434F93ED-2807-11D8-8B75-00039363E640@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1070755222 5707 80.91.224.253 (7 Dec 2003 00:00:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 00:00:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Jan Nieuwenhuizen , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 07 01:00:19 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1ASmLT-0002MM-00 for ; Sun, 07 Dec 2003 01:00:19 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1ASmLT-0004BY-00 for ; Sun, 07 Dec 2003 01:00:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1ASnIr-0001OR-1p for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2003 20:01:41 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1ASnHo-0000ya-Uh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2003 20:00:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1ASnH9-0000ob-0i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2003 20:00:27 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.237] (helo=pfepc.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1ASnH8-0000oV-Me; Sat, 06 Dec 2003 19:59:54 -0500 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (0x503e2644.bynxx3.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.62.38.68]) by pfepc.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 33F10262919; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 00:58:27 +0100 (CET) Original-To: "Jan D." In-Reply-To: <434F93ED-2807-11D8-8B75-00039363E640@swipnet.se> Original-Lines: 21 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:18481 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:18481 "Jan D." writes: > Anyway, I have a solution I'd like to test some more and check in > next weekend if it is OK (still away during the week). But it > makes a change on how the geometry height is interpreted. Now > a height of 24 means 24 - tool bar height - menu bar height. I'd like > it to be that if you disable both the menu bar and the tool bar, you > get 24, and external menu bar and/or tool bar does not count. > > Thus, for GTK you would always get 24 (external tool and menu bar). > For Lucid, you would get 24 - tool bar height (external menu bar). > For no toolkit version you would get 24 - tool bar height - menu bar > height. > If you have disabled both menu and tool bar you always get 24. > > Does this sound reasonable? Sounds reasonable to me. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk