From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: User-reserved element in byte code vectors Date: 19 May 2004 09:34:55 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <85ekpz5twj.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> <874qqiao9o.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> <20040515231012.GA20052@fencepost> <20040517220612.GA6421@fencepost> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1084953708 23457 80.91.224.253 (19 May 2004 08:01:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 08:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lars@nocrew.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Wed May 19 10:01:39 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BQM1D-0004sq-00 for ; Wed, 19 May 2004 10:01:39 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BQM11-0001Ht-00 for ; Wed, 19 May 2004 10:01:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BQLlK-0003gM-7d for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 03:45:14 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BQLj1-0002z6-B7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 03:42:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BQLiU-0002oE-6j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 03:42:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [212.88.64.25] (helo=mail-relay.sonofon.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BQLiT-0002ne-CQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 03:42:17 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 33315 invoked from network); 19 May 2004 07:34:54 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk) (213.83.150.2) by 0 with SMTP; 19 May 2004 07:34:54 -0000 Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:23693 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:23693 Stefan Monnier writes: > I think paying one extra word for each and every closure ever created from > now on, just because of the remote possibility that someone will want > something like rcurry and will want it to be really efficient and that > someone will not prefer some other implementation.... > Are you people serious? I agree with Stefan -- I see no need for that extra slot. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk