From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Benjamin Riefenstahl Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: display word wrapping Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 13:13:36 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20040603014557.2316.LEKTU@mi.madritel.es> <20040603115248.96C0.JMBARRANQUERO@wke.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1086606863 16954 80.91.224.253 (7 Jun 2004 11:14:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 11:14:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 07 13:14:08 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BXI4t-0004Ki-00 for ; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 13:14:07 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BXI4t-0002c6-00 for ; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 13:14:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BXI5Q-0007Qy-GO for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 07:14:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BXI5N-0007Qk-90 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 07:14:37 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BXI5L-0007Pp-4v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 07:14:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BXI5K-0007Pi-JB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 07:14:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [193.28.100.151] (helo=mail.epost.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BXI4Q-00046a-KB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 07:13:38 -0400 Original-Received: from seneca.benny.turtle-trading.net.epost.de (193.99.153.30) by mail.epost.de (6.7.015) id 40C3BF9500016103; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 13:13:36 +0200 Original-To: Juanma Barranquero In-Reply-To: <20040603115248.96C0.JMBARRANQUERO@wke.es> (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Thu, 03 Jun 2004 11:54:47 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1001 (Gnus v5.10.1) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:24657 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:24657 Hi Juanma, > Benjamin Riefenstahl wrote: >> > + GnuWin32 (http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net). These are built >> > + with MinGW and work better with GCC/MinGW builds of Emacs, like >> > + the official binary tarballs for Windows. [...] Juanma Barranquero writes: > No. I meant: "work better with GCC/MinGW builds of Emacs, like (for > example) the official binary builds, which are made with GCC." > > Care to suggest a better wording? Ah, ok, the "better" threw me off. You mention no alternative that this is "better than." How about: These are built with MinGW and so they work better than other compiles with the official builds of Emacs, which are also made with MinGW. benny