From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
Cc: juri@jurta.org, lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se,
teirllm@dms.auburn.edu, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?)
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:07:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3ll8ed6b8.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x5acovnp55.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Wed, 23 Mar 2005 02:10:14 +0100")
David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:
> Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> It would be wrong for preview-latex, probably one of the most
>> important applications extensively using the display property.
>>
>> With all due respect, I have not been shown a reason to consider
>> that package tremendously important. All user program are important
>> to some extent, but I don't see why this one should be overridingly
>> so.
>
> Oh, I was not as immodest to claim one of the most important
> applications whatsoever, but only among a particular subset. It
> actually happens to be rather easy to be "one of the most important
> applications [among those that are] _extensively_ using the display
> property", since there are not many of them. The only other one I can
> think of right now would be w3, and development of that appears pretty
> much stagnant.
I fully agree with David that we should not make such changes to the
behaviour of the display property that would break _the_ major package
actually using it for anything non-trivial.
Instead we can explicitly put an inivisible property together with the
display property on a priece of "hidden" text which should be ignored
by searches. That need a little work to check all uses of display
properties, but it doesn't break any old code relying on the current
behaviour.
I don't know whether it actually works to put both invisible and
display on some text (with the effect of showing the image and
ignoring the under-laying text). Would someone make some examples
to check it?
--
Kim F. Storm <storm@cua.dk> http://www.cua.dk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-23 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-21 13:20 Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?) Lennart Borgman
2005-03-21 13:49 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-03-21 14:00 ` Lennart Borgman
2005-03-21 19:27 ` Juri Linkov
2005-03-21 20:18 ` David Kastrup
2005-03-22 13:57 ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-22 14:46 ` David Kastrup
2005-03-22 17:29 ` Juri Linkov
2005-03-22 22:22 ` David Kastrup
2005-03-23 6:21 ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-23 13:08 ` Juri Linkov
2005-03-23 14:19 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-03-23 15:19 ` Juri Linkov
2005-03-23 17:03 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-03-23 20:21 ` Juri Linkov
2005-03-23 20:33 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-03-23 21:16 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-03-23 21:42 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-03-23 22:54 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-03-24 1:18 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-03-25 6:42 ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-23 21:44 ` Drew Adams
2005-03-24 0:21 ` Juri Linkov
2005-03-24 1:12 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-03-25 6:41 ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-23 21:30 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-03-24 5:18 ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-23 20:26 ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-24 0:19 ` Juri Linkov
2005-03-25 6:42 ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-23 0:59 ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-23 1:10 ` David Kastrup
2005-03-23 10:07 ` Kim F. Storm [this message]
2005-03-23 11:01 ` David Kastrup
2005-03-23 22:57 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-03-23 23:00 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-03-23 23:57 ` David Kastrup
2005-03-25 6:42 ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-23 12:59 ` Juri Linkov
2005-08-10 0:19 ` Drew Adams
2005-08-10 3:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-08-10 4:19 ` Drew Adams
2005-08-10 4:03 ` Juri Linkov
2005-03-21 23:20 ` Drew Adams
2005-03-22 4:57 ` Miles Bader
2005-03-22 10:51 ` David Kastrup
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3ll8ed6b8.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk \
--to=storm@cua.dk \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=juri@jurta.org \
--cc=lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=teirllm@dms.auburn.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).