From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `key-binding' and XEmacs-style events Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:35:38 +0100 Message-ID: References: <36817.128.165.123.18.1172703473.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> <38667.128.165.123.18.1172788075.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172792112 27633 80.91.229.12 (1 Mar 2007 23:35:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 23:35:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , rms@gnu.org To: herring@lanl.gov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 02 00:35:05 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HMung-0001CP-89 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:35:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HMunf-0003Qa-QK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 18:35:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HMunW-0003QV-2Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 18:34:54 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HMunT-0003QJ-HI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 18:34:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HMunT-0003QG-Dr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 18:34:51 -0500 Original-Received: from pfepb.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.236]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HMunS-00057l-6T; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 18:34:50 -0500 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (0x503e2644.bynxx19.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.62.38.68]) by pfepb.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 356D4A50008; Fri, 2 Mar 2007 00:34:44 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <38667.128.165.123.18.1172788075.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> (Stuart D. Herring's message of "Thu\, 1 Mar 2007 14\:27\:55 -0800 \(PST\)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67175 Archived-At: "Stuart D. Herring" writes: > We're talking about going the other way -- supporting (key-binding [(?a)]) > in Emacs Yes, but we don't have to fix it. If you want to write portable code, simply use the GNU Emacs format [?a], as this is also supported by XEmacs. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk