From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Pushing the `gnus-range-*' functions down into the C layer Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 23:58:01 +0200 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: <8739ti68sz.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284069625 31803 80.91.229.12 (9 Sep 2010 22:00:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 22:00:25 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 10 00:00:22 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OtpAM-0004pn-5C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 00:00:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34809 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OtpAL-0002Jx-Ky for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:00:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57048 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OtpAE-0002Jh-FO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:00:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OtpAA-00079g-UE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:00:14 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:58875) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OtpAA-00079c-Hg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:00:10 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OtpA5-0004jJ-Ar for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 00:00:05 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no ([84.215.34.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 00:00:05 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 00:00:05 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 19 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAElBMVEUNAwYzEySiiZdyS2EC AABaNkvfwdThAAACXElEQVQ4jV2UTW7jMAyF6alnb8bVfkLBB7AI7lXAB4hM8P5XmUenyRSjpLDE j3z8kVP6HJ9ENPfjOGZ8+0xUIuJBCzMAHU9w0AGvY6ZOfe4vkCv3cIBzxnaaXmDBgXrnJZ3nn1Iw H9OEB/768lNqmdNGxHQgUermwgZbSqGFsoR3CF3HCWLz0Y/M984xzzDB/+gX+JccPc5ZAyL7f32A 8bOf/hNk6DSmJ/ic3+Brxij6WLL1LBIlIMf3ds56c6449X6lnxPQ/LVkH7SaPI4nOD5kHdSnhQGm IiJb9t6pidRB9JVgog9JgpC0izwmmnwhPH5dAKXzBf4Q/baFEHjWPDLzcoNSu0N8J0IrZ70/wQRw uwDue/DUxE5IYTXZXLaFy2CKPMZNKpSwuwMwXhOmnfkUP0U8wkTM5M7sajQKgOoLYJcAUuZ8q1Wb qLlKBfjDASeqziuOTeo3aDtbG4UU2TVUa0Y0VbdMEYVqIFIbTHAGVnhG0wYwrepNLnJp7UtgNMgR 4a+AXBaBGgFMo6GqmjJArbo6RkZyuZpmAaHuLdMkqCr44KfyVIEMWsqLQ0F5a54iifJKsiuyrK26 mADkcGqr4QCQtyvquWrdVE+4Ikcg+RvkCEKvPhT6Xr9JbaFWtG0niY3VWC9jKpVzL6fUnSTipiPc iymbxdrM0WBD8rJGcS0w+qg2wnBCDo/BA8ph656tY9rFr3IHB6srN9dawHEMrULbGL6XEgwvGMfu UGtIvmE+I98pBs+3Ee9EnAD3NeDDEXvbfCBGzfazPvA/yBSueLidiMU9u4c+/gLgZsDT5Qb6BQAA AABJRU5ErkJggg== Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Nadja's _Thoumogenesis_: "Thoumogenesis" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:sk0cgJBDZQ6yCmoSyw2MjisTiX4= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:129836 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > I think it's a good idea. We've seen IMAP article numbers overflow > native Emacs ints at least once and it's been discussed a few times, e.g.: > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/65390/match=overflow > > so maybe this API needs to support true 32-bit ints (perhaps through > doubles) as per RFC 3501. Well, I was thinking that the range things would just have normal Elisp ints in them (like they do now), so having the ranges in C wouldn't actually solve that problem. But aren't everybody on 64-bit systems now? :-) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen