From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: joakim@verona.se Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Lexbind Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:39:58 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87sjuulr20.fsf@gmail.com> <87aah2p1s1.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300434026 23871 80.91.229.12 (18 Mar 2011 07:40:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 07:40:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 18 08:40:21 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0UIH-0003SS-CB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:40:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54639 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q0UIG-0003kX-Ay for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 03:40:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44727 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q0UI0-0003jf-2C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 03:40:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0UHx-0007JF-Gz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 03:40:02 -0400 Original-Received: from batman.blixtvik.net ([87.96.254.3]:42611) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0UHx-0007IV-9p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 03:40:01 -0400 Original-Received: from www.verona.se (10-208-96-87.cust.blixtvik.se [87.96.208.10]) by batman.blixtvik.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E08D7FB074; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:39:59 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from chopper (DIR-655.lan [192.168.200.125]) by www.verona.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 380D93C47; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:39:59 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Fri, 18 Mar 2011 00:29:03 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 87.96.254.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:137390 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero writes: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 21:01, Stefan Monnier = wrote: > >> Hmm... the lexbind branch does not touch the redisplay code at all, so >> this is perplexing. > > Perhaps it is just bad luck that I didn't get lockups running the > trunk, but I don't think so. It's happened at least five or six times > with lexbind-new, and I don't remember the last time I had trouble > with the trunk. > >> My best guess so far is that some part of the >> changed C code corrupts some part of the memory, leading to the inf-loop. > > So it's going to be difficult to catch :-( What's the state of running Emacs under Valgrind these days? I have a vague memory that it might be possible with an undumped Emacs. > =A0 =A0 Juanma > --=20 Joakim Verona