From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Towards a cleaner build: eieio Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2019 14:36:14 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83a7eo9nsh.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="64268"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 16 14:38:10 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hcUQD-000GbA-Ls for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 14:38:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39434 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hcUQC-0002vx-OH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 08:38:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41705) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hcUOR-0002uh-Gv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 08:36:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hcUOQ-0004DX-EI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 08:36:19 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:49052) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hcUOQ-0004Cj-7g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 08:36:18 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hcUOM-0002cD-NW; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 14:36:17 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAIVBMVEUKDUgAAEsAAU36+ARM S0QAAE+ujyb//wAAAE3+/wjWxRnUA99JAAACNklEQVQ4jbXSQYvaQBQA4FFCK3sypYUcNegiPW3J krA5RXc6LZ5scMCjNdPZklMhxYAnIwbmuNBTb7aRCPmVfZNJXN312gdxzHy+vPG9oLvfL+JO7iE3 DHkRhnkRFnkBEeSw8jxDFtxk6nLlIr/LFTnx5fg/YOP7SxAxRMgFsD0ti6ML4IXPa8CVY0xevSge R3NdbzOtcJ7DTjeSZH4Vu+HhHIYSWnCgaE+yMzAEhKwRjbpPhOI9wEysA7hZDYVOnOOpvhoyJyFw 4BshfO1Qw6NQscZ8NBOztPdQwU9xGjSl00MFZXXRKj/TNKUTLVAwKLe+1yl0yr0HCUuMMSQtyu0+ pXQSu0HZK9nc4WZnqEcBFE5UQ/xD36knAfhZwfERkoYhjColiG9JDR/anxORrKEJAFpomzX8WUPG ZtQsy/sdTwGMdGG2NRKuVvNm3/fpxlSwul/x0FKpt32fUrOC5cmIIsZMUz4qsyzr1/lUbW8c5UiH QBrhYXauSDdUD990tNPJSpADlDHYdE8M6QPoJ4ULNPXNznG0bzH2MJ4ATBBu+NTUnAoYY5xxMsWe 6Gqe1zSvasCYzxmZcjaDsX4hDB1UjX4HaTAqzJmcN30f79XLoMtWz6A++ihPAbB4rUBK2Wz5ewnf PlVgXGPUkLtlRs9ZKGjo7SAuxgxpLeG/o+nE2akaNibQcCdys127t+/TrfO3ehMdq27qOHTng21c w9Mk4C8vzW18o8CCW5tzaLvMXBrXFfwDmRTVdnC3Ri4AAAAASUVORK5CYII= In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sat, 15 Jun 2019 12:31:10 -0400") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 80.91.231.51 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:237722 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> Sorry, I meant -- are all these object-print methods supposed to be >> expressed as cl-print-object methods instead? > > I think so. > >> And if so, can they be rewritten that way now without breaking anything? > > I think so too (tho they'll only work that way with Emacs>26, of course). OK; I'll take a look at rewriting one of them to see how much work it is... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no