From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Cygwin build (was: Using GDB in NTEMACS) Date: 24 Feb 2002 12:05:41 +0000 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1014553995 17468 195.204.10.66 (24 Feb 2002 12:33:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 Feb 2002 12:33:15 GMT Cc: Ehud Karni , jcast@ou.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16exq7-0004Xe-00 for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 13:33:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16exnH-0002Z3-00; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 07:30:19 -0500 Original-Received: from gadolinium.btinternet.com ([194.73.73.111]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16exmJ-0002Un-00 for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 07:29:19 -0500 Original-Received: from host213-1-139-247.btinternet.com ([213.1.139.247] helo=nyaumo.btinternet.com) by gadolinium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #8) id 16exlb-0003Og-00; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 12:28:35 +0000 Original-Received: from nyaumo.btinternet.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nyaumo.btinternet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id MAA00671; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 12:05:41 GMT Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.50 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:1482 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1482 Eli Zaretskii writes: > The DJGPP port of GNU `ls' also reads the files, for the same reasons, > but someone (perhaps even you) told me that it is much faster. In my experience, all the Cygwin tools are much slower than native ports. They have improved since a few years ago though, when Cygwin diff took about 2 minutes on a 250k file, while a native port took about 10 seconds. -- Jason Rumney _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel