From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: joakim@verona.se Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bazaar migration status? Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:06:21 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1247850408 15939 80.91.229.12 (17 Jul 2009 17:06:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:06:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Development To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 17 19:06:41 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MRqtM-00009I-9j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:06:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47548 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MRqtL-00085y-TE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:06:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MRqtH-00085j-Ga for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:06:35 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MRqtC-000848-CO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:06:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46061 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MRqtC-00083v-8G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:06:30 -0400 Original-Received: from iwfs.imcode.com ([82.115.149.64]:35452 helo=gate.verona.se) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MRqtA-00042j-Af for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:06:29 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain (IDENT:1005@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gate.verona.se (8.13.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id n6HH6LA8016834; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:06:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:50:43 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:112623 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> To make a long story short, I've made a misstake and my branches are >> no longer syncable from Jasons repository. > > Are you sure it was a mistake of yours: Jason's repository has had > problems (around the same time the CVS crashed, tho I think it was just > a coincidence). I think Jason was trying to get a new one going, but > I don't know its status (and it wouldn't be syncable with the old > one :-( ) My mistake was not expecting this to happen with an experimental repos, and not properly exporting my patches before trying to get up to date with the new repos. So its my fault, and now I have a lot more work to do before I can get up to speed again. My point is I would expect this not to happen with a canonical Emacs bzr repos, even if it had some flaws in the translation data. > But, yes, I'm also eager to see us move away from CVS. Can we translate this mutual eagerness into actual action? FWIW when I encounter this situation in my professional role I usually just disable committing to the old repos, leaving it on-line, and start fresh with the new repos. > > > Stefan -- Joakim Verona