From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Infinite loop in pop3-retr Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 19:21:01 +0200 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: <4dde12c597bf00.88976681@wp.pl> <87d3j4lc7u.fsf@vitiris.tt.com.pl> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1306776092 31959 80.91.229.12 (30 May 2011 17:21:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 17:21:32 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 30 19:21:28 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QR69f-0005Us-SN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 19:21:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49143 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QR69f-0002Ul-Dw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 13:21:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57837) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QR69c-0002UU-LZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 13:21:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QR69b-000386-Fn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 13:21:24 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:36383) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QR69b-00037x-4E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 13:21:23 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QR69Z-0005Rb-MD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 19:21:21 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no ([84.215.51.58]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 19:21:21 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 19:21:21 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 23 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.215.51.58.getinternet.no Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAElBMVEUIBANBLiAgFhC1o4sN CQhaRDL3FEQhAAACcklEQVQ4jV2TzXbiMAyFBcfsUcD7WHX2Q328dzLufmyj93+VuUpoZ1odyIH7 Wb9WKKWHakufltnjL4vQD2BMddqBAkzfyQG8Mo8fIL7A7X9dR+4HaP8cxh758Mie2bQ3e8BVE1IY eCCFh/bboouB3ES2A1gseCD22IuUaAChOI/JokiV1Fg51o0yZPby1oaFgHLfRCxHMzCJ1x3U0JbJ AdUXCGpgqlW2Usvmp0rvh8fQMfK91BrmQgsKphxMh4c+OTpoLbrA8EAVALc8rK3Fhr1WYYkolzH9 JeUx0BoG8X5pqhmds4HbyOjx4Wmk9w/0ODqp6aI31YSiCw5fMC0/CIOE5WaVxHzdtJ0Vd5iQ7V0k 5H4xx8e08uQgpxeQy5/rBe11PjE7j0m+QKTam4x7E8c83zJioYwHbTFK6pKebXZBypvmxoTi+xkX M/qS771Qd9XZZpFdc+T5lPqtb5GKuqkE3zCrNeU/Qqf0zB+txDk9uTiUQ7/oQ69ELnW0EqeuWgud p0IzXdKTpGhTr1PoS6qVzjES0QXZdbZ10h5A11rOuFqiU26rXnF8B/hGWmPdAY5dP3Txra+35z0I bdXA2YLcT7o0Dqu/BiwbmYeri0XnFmsJgecQZwDAcyG8RM+KKisxx4DiyQG4QkhZvc5lw2LwaTYN ofBZmbvXuwhjM7ZYIFcydsLUUC6OA8To9qh7XUji0TqGOnGcAXC8FLcDNqdmFw8PGNXqyLHaS3Is a9xspw0ABYUCC7YRm7w8YMFyymH1MLKAtCJCNTWatsUvj40/D37ZAdbW7Heh4r4Ajha3Nmxb+e6B d7egx4qtsTG4T/wXA3rVQ5QHL2YAAAAASUVORK5CYII= Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Jenny Hval's _Viscera_: "How Gentle" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:+M83rmqVKGyDE0WN6ATd9pKQ0hg= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139897 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> Firstly, I think that probably there is a simpler way to check if >> process is active than by testing process status but I don't know that. > > Actually, no, this is the way to do it. Which reminds me. Instead of sprinkling all the code with (memq (process-status process) '(open run)) which isn't very... pretty... (there's probably hundreds variations of these invocations in Gnus and the other network oriented packages) wouldn't it be nice if we had a nice, simple function like `process-alive-p' or something like that? It would just basically be (defun process-alive-p (process) (memq (process-status process) '(run open listen connect))) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/