From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: joakim@verona.se Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: heisenbugs 1 joakim 0 Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2011 00:47:23 +0200 Message-ID: References: <8339hjbv9m.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312670880 24020 80.91.229.12 (6 Aug 2011 22:48:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2011 22:48:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 07 00:47:56 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qppet-0006Bc-7P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2011 00:47:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46449 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qppes-0004I1-J0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2011 18:47:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45425) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qppeq-0004Hu-3K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2011 18:47:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qppep-00012j-70 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2011 18:47:52 -0400 Original-Received: from batman.blixtvik.net ([87.96.254.3]:53603) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qppen-00012K-KR; Sat, 06 Aug 2011 18:47:49 -0400 Original-Received: from chopper.vpn.verona.se (139-210-96-87.cust.blixtvik.se [87.96.210.139]) by batman.blixtvik.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601C87F8573; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 00:47:24 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <8339hjbv9m.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 02 Aug 2011 20:03:49 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 87.96.254.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:142945 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: joakim@verona.se >> Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 15:39:07 +0200 >> >> - The recent bidi change seemed to introduce some visual artifacts >> sometimes during scrolling. > > Do these artifacts disappear if you set bidi-display-reordering to a > nil value? If they don't disappear, then the probability that they > are caused by bidi are low, because setting that variable to nil > disables most of the bidi code. (The probability is low to begin > with, because bidi changes didn't touch the display back-ends, where > pixel drawing happens.) This had nothing to do with bidi. I started playing a game with my son which required some experimental direct rendering settings. This aparently affected the 3D accelerated WM in Gnome3, so scrolling of window text got affected. So, sorry for the noise. -- Joakim Verona