From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Towards a cleaner build Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 12:19:08 +0200 Message-ID: References: <8336ldd49j.fsf@gnu.org> <83r28xbhv1.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="149643"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 17 13:11:44 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hRam8-000clz-5f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 13:11:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46643 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRam6-0001vf-Uv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 07:11:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49256) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRa6w-0006HC-Ml for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 06:29:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRZxJ-0002j7-FH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 06:19:14 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:60814) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRZxJ-0002hk-82; Fri, 17 May 2019 06:19:13 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hRZxE-0001mJ-TL; Fri, 17 May 2019 12:19:11 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAFVBMVEWpm356Wj16Lh58RS0D AgIOCQlXGRRYnXIxAAACVElEQVQ4jXWUwY6kIBCGizbdZ0oyngXSnIFKfAKd88z24nnUyPs/whai k01mt6KR8PEXxQ8I6T8B47+jgGne2tVqzC6XSPzuFdhwswrAKEOGQ8fYVbAEoZUHE00NK06wIXiE G/fY0r96qGBcAlAPjbFVEgAuhefR0JQJmEUP2I0Tg/fFNwxEBbbnVgULqtb0AMTYktGsHU6AGBDA N2QjGQBU3TfACrhiW8Awlck3RCqAOCxpCW3sDsAKKqmi8dFw3YDtBRQDCexItAxEOFNxVwUWW8tf gdgdtqOogCvQir83BkUxnQoeiJaL8DcKw2HJFyguzBeF0gikVKheLVJl/E7FCgziAJ+oNna0pOIF SX9TJ+Bys6ygtcorQVakv0BJRRRpFVlUwBbOUEFAkiosF1DbpWh1DCp8nSCleQ5FIiV21P2K/Qk+ cQvY8ezQmWGNkQ/DBXAvkvuLFA1lKbKCF257UMcCW9dZbjUVzOVczgy4RxN1H/JM9cq5mAsoMITg spTn5DOnPqpCiC5pKy/FnJfiIcAD8QWyzPGolpB/BH+ADiWqTxBvDKZRZmhyMeUtdZjc/qFvFfgd 7qmA+7inxI9u3WXJPmcGrXuOk9nTuuYTpJkbfLAY5H1Kq/kGv/mscjQp3VwejKnlTnx3tqHUm1eX Vu1WAxeYclc2d89unY1rz63lbr0naNkQfFs3o9v+BLOhVwMtb4N/5N64tW9OxUjzEwUBBE/HDXke QLvd7kk1RLyJwLdOiLrAORnzfOdb4wVnYwzKnal4JeOPv0/6+eeZysg/xgfLfevm13MAAAAASUVO RK5CYII= In-Reply-To: <83r28xbhv1.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 17 May 2019 11:33:22 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 80.91.231.51 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:236646 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > Would it make sense instead to move it to a separate file and put that >> > file in lisp/obsolete? >> >> I can do that if you think that's the right solution. But it's been >> obsolete since 2013, so isn't it time for it to go? > > Moving it into obsolete is a way of making it "go", no? But we do eventually remove obsolete stuff from lisp/obsolete too, right? :-) I'm just wondering whether there's a policy on these things so that I don't have to bother you with these details -- a period of time, or a number of releases, or something, that determines when code marked as obsolete should be deleted from the Emacs source tree. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no