From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Towards a cleaner build: other output Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 12:44:21 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="235457"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Noam Postavsky , Emacs developers To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 21 12:45:04 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1heH2W-000z7Q-7b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 12:45:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59034 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1heH2U-0005y5-Eu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 06:45:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38151) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1heH22-0005vH-9E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 06:44:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1heH1y-0008Ed-6k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 06:44:34 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:58086) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1heH1y-0008Cb-0Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 06:44:30 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=stories) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1heH1q-0000t1-4n; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 12:44:24 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAKlBMVEXSzs7///0aEBIIAgP/ //v+/fr///76+PV9dXb///z///85LzKln59cUlS4kUT6AAACXklEQVQ4jXXUzWsaQRQA8LGHNFhz eGAHukdzEcSLeylIDoWkEG9CU4gn99AJDAYiNAkNLVgCRfJxCLQHPbmHjOWhl3jLRljoRdLtJV5K E/+XvpldrRo7yMrOb97MvDe7y/YbjQsOAoRwBHCHfkIIdDbYB5C4oLnsPQD9LQSBCJcl+Y6jFNKN 4lU4lajU/I8+Y8xPsPgUKFEOgkQiSDDfD2YA1A7FqaltKFZ1NAhnqlOGQONcsKZBGCjqvfGZaXAC 1Bw+l0gELowLMMmjxE3//OJRhEtVnFuEQAmpOO14LErqnRAkzoIDrvbqT0vYYuwIv997NwZW7FEV xKd87UB2TjO3uJvKvDTwLKdhOXdTlZ1emsDOpEOwswQ/c/kl7PT6GlJhBHVVuTr2MnGsDLMa7DXK 4y2u1OtVS/2ojeJY/vUQx67taShQbR10xXHtCYE+p24YUTB7t9TAXw6PCDtB4E8grPVMdTW4Fs43 xZrYPjzcfyQ6ojL6fcaxrauBe3ShgUchDPMPIMs5O47qPnWC3Yx3TQkWqGgpDXl7STp3qyeU4JWG EoGdJkitxqwIslHElb0GcueuF+MwTH3RRfxD0MSu5/VBts5PYwCe9xl3+6NrAy3KFGR7UI+hGgS3 WAnookFXZCqD6IRp8cWph7VaBM1HXf8BenTkQqBZzRM2OY8pcCYgZ6dyuBDjE1T/AAVQc9hrM15H u0ZdBNPYJhS3Acy7YD4Dru59AUlWVOEI4K55qaK7JHsFyTHoFWAC24319U240Deu5egB+q2D52zL tDeNja2vjW+HZkP663L5FwseSvDlny9aAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 20 Jun 2019 14:55:38 -0400") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 80.91.231.51 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:238000 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > FWIW, the differences with defvar+put that I can see are: > 1- the docstring is purecopied if applicable (it's not applicable here). > 2- the var is globally declared as dynamically-scoped (rather than only > in the current file). > 3- the variable is added to `load-history`. > > I'm not sure whether (2) and (3) are advantages or disadvantages in the > present case. I think... perhaps the latter two are disadvantages here. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no