From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-trunk-diffs] Changes to emacs/lisp/faces.el Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:14:47 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87mzwsws3d.fsf@jurta.org> <41B6317B.6020303@esperanto.org> <41BC0D29.9020007@t-online.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1103127544 31008 80.91.229.6 (15 Dec 2004 16:19:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:19:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, occitan@esperanto.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 15 17:18:55 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cebrb-0001DE-00 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:18:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cec1m-0004vQ-9u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:29:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Cebzl-0004m4-EI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:27:21 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Cebzh-0004gp-EM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:27:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cebzh-0004ed-Aq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:27:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [212.88.64.25] (helo=mail-relay.sonofon.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cebn4-0005FT-VJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:14:15 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 21094 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2004 16:14:13 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk) (213.83.150.2) by 0 with SMTP; 15 Dec 2004 16:14:13 -0000 Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Wed, 15 Dec 2004 09:58:19 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:31166 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:31166 Richard Stallman writes: > I think this looks better too -- but the current escape-glyph face doesn't > stand out very much -- what about "red" foreground instead? > > I think it should not stand out very much. > > The aim isn't to help the user quickly find all the escape sequences, > merely to confirm that they are escape sequences. For this purpose, a > font that is merely visible is ideal. If it stands out, it tends to > be distracting. Ok. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk