From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: joakim@verona.se Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: patch for optional inhibit of delete-other-windows(IDE feature) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:38:20 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1209393802 16584 80.91.229.12 (28 Apr 2008 14:43:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:43:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 28 16:43:54 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JqUZZ-0007lh-Cy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:43:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47677 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JqUYr-0002qz-SM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:42:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JqUYm-0002nV-BX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:42:28 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JqUYj-0002hz-Ho for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:42:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33179 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JqUYj-0002hq-8r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:42:25 -0400 Original-Received: from iwfs.imcode.com ([82.115.149.64] helo=gate.verona.se) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JqUYi-0005Eu-LJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:42:24 -0400 Original-Received: from chopper (IDENT:1005@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gate.verona.se (8.13.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id m3SEgKXU029035; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:42:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:27:31 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:96062 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> Maybe "pin" and "group" should really be one parameter or whatever. > > Right. Maybe all the pinned windows can just be in their own group. > But maybe conflating the two is not good enough. My intuition is that conflating the properties is not quite good enough, so I will start with two separate properties. I intuit this because maybe you want different pinned groups, and maybe you want different groups that are not pinned. However, I have as yet no real use-case for the above options, except my status-window example, and the ECB, neither of which seem to require both "pin" and "groups". > > > Stefan -- Joakim Verona