From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tramp with global-auto-revert-mode. Date: 15 May 2004 00:57:41 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200405122254.i4CMsUj29445@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200405122326.i4CNQk929511@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200405132324.i4DNOBs14811@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200405140008.i4E08lb14858@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <871xln4xmc.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87oeorb5pq.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1084577505 7975 80.91.224.253 (14 May 2004 23:31:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 23:31:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Kai Grossjohann , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sat May 15 01:31:34 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BOm9O-0004wU-00 for ; Sat, 15 May 2004 01:31:34 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BOm9O-0002cA-00 for ; Sat, 15 May 2004 01:31:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BOm3Z-0006Sk-EY for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Fri, 14 May 2004 19:25:33 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BOlqC-0004F2-Pd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2004 19:11:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BOlhH-0002DN-2n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2004 19:03:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.41.46.235] (helo=pfepa.post.tele.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BOlcj-0000yo-94; Fri, 14 May 2004 18:57:49 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk (0x503e2644.bynxx3.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.62.38.68]) by pfepa.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 2977E47FE0C; Sat, 15 May 2004 00:57:44 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: David Kastrup In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 24 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:23447 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:23447 David Kastrup writes: > storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes: > > > David Kastrup writes: > > > > > > We probably should not run one and the same timer while it has not > > > yet finished, but freeze different ones? > > > > That would be easy (it can be done in timer-event-handler). > > Uh, that was a rhetorical question, short for "are you really sure > that freezing different timers would be a good idea?". > Doh! I was referring to the first part of that sentence: > > > We probably should not run one and the same timer while it has not > > > yet finished That would be easy. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk