From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Last change to process.c breaks fetching pop3 mail (gnus/pop3.el) Date: 04 Jun 2004 16:20:29 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20040530160908.436326.FMU25511@nutty-waffle-cone.splode.com> <20040531143416.431708.FMU25511@nutty-waffle-cone.splode.com> <20040603162601.832889.FMU25511@nutty-waffle-cone.splode.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1086358843 23584 80.91.224.253 (4 Jun 2004 14:20:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 14:20:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 04 16:20:30 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BWFYb-0001Fu-00 for ; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 16:20:29 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BWFYb-0004lt-00 for ; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 16:20:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BWFYz-00056h-Hw for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 10:20:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BWFYx-00056Q-ND for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 10:20:51 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BWFYx-00056E-4W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 10:20:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BWFYx-000564-1f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 10:20:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [212.88.64.25] (helo=mail-relay.sonofon.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BWFYT-0003EJ-Ta for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 10:20:23 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 17851 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2004 14:20:20 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO kfs-l.imdomain.dk.cua.dk) (213.83.150.2) by 0 with SMTP; 4 Jun 2004 14:20:20 -0000 Original-To: Noah Friedman In-Reply-To: <20040603162601.832889.FMU25511@nutty-waffle-cone.splode.com> Original-Lines: 24 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:24530 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:24530 Noah Friedman writes: > >Normally, you would use delete-process to close the connection. > > > >So in that aspect "closed" would be better than "deleted". > > "closed" seems ambiguous to me; either side could close a connection. Ok, so let's settle on "deleted" and keep "exited abnormally ...". > But only the local side can delete it. I think changing the process status > signal is the most reliable indicator of who requested the disconnection. You can test that with process-exit-status when process-status is closed (by either end). > In the meantime the reason string ought to be made more user-friendly > though I don't have any good suggestions. I think we'll leave it as is, ie. if message is "exited(something)" it was closed by remote. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk