unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
Cc: Daniel Brockman <daniel@brockman.se>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: patch: [UP] and [DOWN] buttons for `editable-list' widgets
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 10:39:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3hd37sy7q.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1FkvCB-0007Hl-Bf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Richard Stallman's message of "Mon, 29 May 2006 23:47:03 -0400")

Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:

> I think the Customize interface for editing list values is rather
> unnatural.  Although I can see that adding up and down boxes would
> make a certain case more convenient, I think they would also make it
> more unnatural overall.

In many cases, sequence of entries in a list does not matter,
so it would probably be confusing to have the UP/DOWN buttons
in general.

For some lists, e.g. hooks and paths, sequence may matter quite
a bit, so for those lists, UP/DOWN would make a lot of sense.

The question is how to mark those lists which should have the
UP/DOWN buttons...


>
> So I think I would rather not do this.  What I would rather do
> (after the release, of course) is switch to a more natural interface,
> if someone can find one and implement it.

As long as it is backwards compatible with customize ...

IMO, customize functionality as such is ok, but the visible appearence
is too ugly.  

I have suggested various improvements, but the code is just too tricky
(or too structured :-) for any _simple_ hack to work  (well, I use
them anyway, but they have glitches).

-- 
Kim F. Storm <storm@cua.dk> http://www.cua.dk

  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-30  8:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-29 18:57 patch: [UP] and [DOWN] buttons for `editable-list' widgets Daniel Brockman
2006-05-30  3:47 ` Richard Stallman
2006-05-30  8:39   ` Kim F. Storm [this message]
2006-05-31  0:40     ` Richard Stallman
2006-05-31  4:43       ` Daniel Brockman
2006-05-31 22:30         ` Richard Stallman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3hd37sy7q.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk \
    --to=storm@cua.dk \
    --cc=daniel@brockman.se \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).