From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Tromey Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Patch for fields of `struct buffer' Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:44:59 -0700 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296579927 17279 80.91.229.12 (1 Feb 2011 17:05:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 17:05:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 01 18:05:23 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PkJfL-0007a6-0I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:05:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36683 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PkJUw-0000uf-I0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 11:54:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37445 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PkJRe-0008AJ-Ip for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 11:51:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkJLj-0004yh-AD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 11:45:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:5929) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PkJLh-0004x5-Nu; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 11:45:02 -0500 Original-Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p11Gj08L017820 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 1 Feb 2011 11:45:00 -0500 Original-Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p11Gj0cK022924; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 11:45:00 -0500 Original-Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p11GixWp015807; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 11:44:59 -0500 Original-Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 3AE5C378301; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:44:59 -0700 (MST) X-Attribution: Tom In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Tue, 01 Feb 2011 11:40:19 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.25 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:135408 Archived-At: RMS> This seems to give the right semantics, but having a pointer in RMS> each thread for each DEFVAR_LISP variable makes threads rather RMS> heavy. How many such variables are there now? I'd expect RMS> thousands. 562. Tom